WRITING IN APHASIA REHABILITATION - CURSIVE VS MANUSCRIPT
WRITING IN APHASIA REHABILITATION - CURSIVE VS MANUSCRIPT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1044/jshd.4104.523
复制
发表时间：
1976-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
FRIEDMAN, HM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BOONE, DR;FRIEDMAN, HM
观察了30例成人失语症患者的阅读和写的表现，以确定是否有显着差异时，刺激和手动反应的书面形式：草书与手稿。患者被要求大声朗读10个手写单词和10个手写单词。然后，他们被要求写上听写10个字的反应，使用草书写作和10个字的手稿写作。记录每名患者在草书和手稿书写任务中正确阅读的单词数、正确书写的单词数和正确顺序书写的字母数。结果表明，这些失语症患者作为一个群体，草书和手稿写作风格之间的正确反应没有显着差异，但是，值得注意的是，个别患者在使用一种写作形式的成功率差异很大。由于两种书写形式都没有表现出更好的促进性能，因此所使用的书写风格应根据个体患者自己的偏好和最佳性能来确定。
Reading and writing performance was observed in 30 adult aphasic patients to determine whether there was a significant difference when stimuli and manual responses were varied in the written form: cursive versus manuscript. Patients were asked to read aloud 10 words written cursively and 10 words written in manuscript form. They were then asked to write on dictation 10 word responses using cursive writing and 10 words using manuscript writing. Number of words correctly read, number of words correctly written, and number of letters correctly written in the proper sequence were tallied for both cursive and manuscript writing tasks for each patient. Results indicated no significant difference in correct response between cursive and manuscript writing style for these aphasic patients as a group; however, it was noted that individual patients varied widely in their success using one writing form over the other. It appeared that since neither writing form showed better facilitation of performance, the writing style used should be determined according to the individual patient’s own preference and best performance.