Treating cerebral edema in diabetic ketoacidosis: caveats in extrapolating from traumatic brain injury*.
Treating cerebral edema in diabetic ketoacidosis: caveats in extrapolating from traumatic brain injury*.
复制标题
治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒的脑水肿:从创伤性脑损伤推断的注意事项*。
DOI:
10.1097/pcc.0b013e31829f6c77
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Vavilala,MonicaS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vavilala,MonicaS
Editorials724 www. pccmjournal. org September 2013• Volume 14• Number 7 class II evidence (19). In fact, the relationship between hyperosmolar agent and outcome may depend on the underlying neurological condition. For example, in one study of adult surgical patients undergoing craniotomy for a variety of conditions who were randomized to receive either 5 mL/kg of 20% mannitol or 3% hypertonic saline, where normocapnia and euvolemia were maintained, Rozet et al (20) reported no difference in brain relaxation or arteriovenous lactate or increases in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate, whereas 3% hypertonic saline was associated with higher CSF Na concentrations over time (20). Furthermore, mannitol and hypertonic saline differ in their cerebrovascular profiles which may impact changes in DKA differently than in other neurological conditions. In this issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, the study by DeCourcey et al (6) reporting a four-fold higher use of 3% hypertonic saline over the 11-year study period highlights the problem with empiric extrapolation of treatment from one disease state to another. Contrary to their hypothesis that declining mortality in DKA may be due to the shift away from mannitol, they report higher mortality among patients who received 3% hypertonic saline even after adjustment for the propensity to receive this medication. Although this study is not definitive in terms of answering the question relating hyperosmolar therapy with DKA-related cerebral edema and/or mortality, DeCourcey et al (6) offer food for thought in a number of areas pertaining to the treatment of DKA-related cerebral edema. First, the study demonstrates a change in clinical practice in favor of hypertonic saline across the United States, despite the absence of supporting evidence or guidelines. This change might not be problematic if hypertonic saline benefits patients with DKA. However, this is not the case and the data are significant, especially given the overall decline in DKA-related mortality, which may be due to change in other treatment or evaluation practices such as IV fluid administration or the use of standardized clinical care pathways. The importance of the study by DeCourcey et al (6) highlighting harm with the use of 3% hypertonic saline in DKA questions our clinical practice of empiric therapeutic extrapolation and addresses the need for critical evaluation of treatments in DKA from patients with DKA and not patients with other neurological conditions. DeCourcey et al (6) correctly point out that there continues to be scientific equipoise for efficacy in the use of the two hyperosmolar agents in DKA. Pending further clarification and studies, underlying differences between neurological conditions should be considered before empirically adopting treatments from one disease state (TBI) to another (DKA).