Do patient intervention ratings predict alcohol-related consequences?
Do patient intervention ratings predict alcohol-related consequences?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.07.011
复制
发表时间：
2007-12-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Goginem, Aruna
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee, Christina S.;Longabaugh, Richard;Goginem, Aruna
对于短期干预行为改变的治疗过程知之甚少。在以患者为中心的酒精简短干预期间，患者对治疗过程的评分用于预测治疗后酒精使用和后果。我们使用来自一项随机临床试验的数据，该试验比较了BI（1次）与BI和助推器（BIB，2次）的效果，以减少有害的饮酒和酒精后果。受试者n = 167（BI）和n = 82（BIB）。与BI相比，BIB条件下的12个评级中有5个评级显著更高。12个月时减少酒精后果的唯一预测因素是BIB参与者的“我获得了一些新的理解”评分较高，t=-2.50，p
Little is known about treatment process for behavior change for brief interventions. Patient ratings of treatment process during a patient-centered brief intervention for alcohol were used to predict post-treatment alcohol use and consequences. We use data from a randomized clinical trial that compared the effects of BI (1 session) to BI and booster (BIB, 2 sessions) to reduce harmful drinking and alcohol consequences. Subjects were n = 167 (BI) and n 82 (BIB). Five of the 12 ratings were rated significantly higher by those in the BIB condition compared to BI. The only predictor of reduced alcohol consequences at 12-months was higher ratings of, "I have obtained some new understanding," for BIB participants t=-2.50,p