Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial.
Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial.
复制标题
使用生物医学风险评估进行简短的动机性吸烟干预的直接和短期影响：Get PHIT 试验。
DOI：
10.1093/ntr/ntp004
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mohelnitzky,Amy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McClure,JenniferB;Ludman,Evette;Grothaus,Lou;Pabiniak,Chester;Richards,Julie;Mohelnitzky,Amy
IntroductionProviding smokers with biologically based evidence of smoking-related disease risk or physical impairment may be an effective way to motivate cessation.MethodsSmokers were recruited for a free health risk assessment and randomized to receive personally tailored feedback based on their lung functioning, carbon monoxide (CO) exposure, and smoking-related health conditions or generic information about the risks of smoking and personalized counseling based on their diet, body mass index, and physical activity. All (n= 536) were advised to quit smoking and offered access to a free telephone cessation program. Participants were surveyed immediately after intervention and 1 month later to assess the impact on various indices of motivation to quit.ResultsImmediately posttreatment, experimental participants rated themselves as more likely to try to quit (p= .02) and reported a greater mean increase in their motivation to quit than controls (p= .04). At 1-month follow-up, however, we found no significant group differences on any motivational indices. In post-hoc analyses comparing smokers in the experimental group with and without lung impairment, persons with impaired lung functioning had a greater change from baseline in posttreatment motivation to quit (adjustedp= .05) and perceived risk of developing a smoking-related disease (p= .03) compared with persons with no lung impairment, but we found no significant treatment effect on any motivational indices at 1 month.DiscussionThe results suggest that the intervention had a small, temporary effect, but we found no clear evidence that the intervention increased motivation to quit smoking during the first month postintervention.
