Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination.
Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32318-7
复制
发表时间:
2020-11-21
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Collyer BS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Anderson RM;Vegvari C;Truscott J;Collyer BS
Comment www. thelancet. com Vol 396 November 21, 2020 1615 post licensure of a COVID-19 vaccine. As such, the impact of vaccination on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 will start slowly and build up over a few years to reach target coverage levels. The amount of vaccine required for a defined population will depend on evidence from phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials on efficacy and what can be assumed about the average duration of vaccine protection—it will be an assumption until the findings of phase 4 trials on duration of both protection against infection and severe disease are reported. For a vaccine with 100% efficacy that gives life-long protection, the level of herd immunity as a proportion of the population, pc, required to block transmission is [1–1/R0], where R0 is the basic reproduction number. 16 Given an R0 value before lockdowns in most countries of between 2· 5 to 3· 5, we estimate the herd immunity required is about 60–72%. If the proportional vaccine efficacy, ε, is considered, the simple expression for pc becomes [1–1/R0]/ε. If we assume ε is 0· 8 (80%), then the herd immunity required becomes 75–90% for the defined range of R0 values. For lower efficacies, the entire population would have to be immunised. These overall estimates ignore heterogeneities that can make these figures lower or higher in specific locations. 17, 18 These calculations become more complicated if we assume immunity is short lived. 19 Calculations of the proportion of the population that will need to be immunised year by year with a COVID-19 vaccine of defined properties can be derived from transmission models of SARS-CoV-2 (appendix). The simple equation for coverage pc becomes a more complicated expression that involves the rate at which people are immunised, ε, the magnitude of R0, and the average duration of protection provided by the vaccine (figure). The surface plotted in the figure shows the percentage of the population in year 1 that must be vaccinated and a similar plot of the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system equilibrates after a few years. A rough idea of this time is given by numerical evaluations of the model and gives equilibration by the end of year 2 (appendix). The percentage of the population that must be vaccinated in year 1 is much larger than the percentage that must be vaccinated once the system has stabilised after a few years, since most of the population will be susceptible as mass immunisation starts, but after a few years, hopefully, a high proportion will be immunised such that effective herd immunity is created. What is clear from our estimates based on the assumptions that efficacy is satisfactory (> 80%) but duration of protection is short (1–2 years), is that a large proportion of the total population would need to be vaccinated if there is to be any chance of getting herd immunity to block the continued transmission of SARS-CoV-2. If the vaccine is protective over a longer duration than natural infection, then our estimates will be too pessimistic. What the duration of immunity is for a given COVID-19 vaccine will only be resolved once community-wide vaccination programmes progress. Phase 3 trials will tell us about efficacy and safety, but well designed phase 4 trials are essential based on representative and large numbers of those vaccinated and follow up over time. These studies will record any serious adverse events and identify whether repeatedly exposed individuals acquire coronavirus infections, particularly SARS-CoV-2, and if they do, what is the severity of disease. These cohortbased longitudinal studies will need careful planning and sustained funding, probably from governments with industry …