Validity and reliability of community health activities model program for seniors and short-form international physical activity questionnaire as physical activity assessment tools in patients with fibromyalgia
Validity and reliability of community health activities model program for seniors and short-form international physical activity questionnaire as physical activity assessment tools in patients with fibromyalgia
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/09638280903166352
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Tong, Yan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kaleth, Anthony S.;Ang, Dennis C.;Tong, Yan
目的。目前缺乏经过良好验证的仪器来定量测量纤维肌痛综合征（FMS）患者的身体活动（PA）水平。本研究旨在确定两份自我报告的体育活动问卷[短格式国际体育活动问卷（s-IPAQ）和老年人社区健康活动模型计划（CHAMPS）]在纤维肌痛人群中的结构效度和重测信度。30名符合美国风湿病学会FMS标准的受试者（平均年龄49.1±9.6岁，90%为女性）被邀请参加本研究。对CHAMPS和s-IPAQ进行两周重测信度评估。通过比较这些问卷报告的PA与加速度计（步数/周、计数/周）和6分钟步行测试（6-MWT）的数据来评估结构效度。与s-IPAQ （r= 0.18; p = 0.15）相比，CHAMPS具有更高的重测信度（r=0.58;p < 0.001）。自述PA问卷与6-MWT或加速度计数据之间无显著相关性（p < 0.05）。在纤维肌痛人群中，s-IPAQ似乎也不是一个可靠和有效的PA评估。CHAMPS具有中等的重测信度；然而，在champ和PA的目标测量之间没有发现关联。鉴于运动对FMS患者的已知益处，有必要开发新的测量方法或验证其他现有的完善的PA问卷。
Purpose. There currently is a paucity of well-validated instruments to quantitatively measure physical activity (PA) levels in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). This study aims to determine the construct validity and test-retest reliability of two self-report physical activity questionnaires [short-form international physical activity questionnaire (s-IPAQ) and community health activities model program for seniors (CHAMPS)l in a fibromyalgia population.Methods. Thirty subjects (mean age 49.1 +/- 9.6 years; 90% females) who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for FMS were invited to participate in the study. Two-week test-retest reliability was evaluated for the CHAMPS and s-IPAQ. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing PA reported from these questionnaires with data obtained from accelerometry (steps/week, counts/week) and the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT).Results. CHAMPS showed greater test-retest reliability (r=0.58;p < 0.001) compared with s-IPAQ (r = 0.18; P = 0.15). No significant correlations were observed between the self-report PA questionnaires and the 6-MWT or accelerometry data (p > 0.05).Conclusions. In a fibromyalgia population, the s-IPAQ does not appear to be a reliable and valid PA assessment too]. CHAMPS displayed moderate test-retest reliability; however, no associations were found between CHAMPS and objectives measures of PA. In view of the known benefits of exercise in patients with FMS, there is a need to develop new measures or validate other existing well-established PA questionnaires.