A Critical Review on Classification and Terminology of Scissor Structures
A Critical Review on Classification and Terminology of Scissor Structures
复制标题
剪式结构分类和术语的批判性评论
DOI：
10.20898/j.iass.2019.199.029
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Koray Korkmaz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Maden;Yenal Akgün;G. Kiper;Şebnem Gür;Müjde Yar;Koray Korkmaz
当对现有的关于运动结构研究的文献进行深入调查时，可以看到不同的研究者使用不同的术语和分类，特别是对于基本单元和运动类型的定义。有些研究是根据基本单元和单元线的几何特性来定义整个几何，而另一些研究则是根据回路来定义。所有这些研究都对相似的元素使用不同的名称。本文旨在回顾有关结构分类和术语的文献，并介绍其研究现状。表格显示了文献中的所有方法。此外，文章还对各术语和定义的缺失进行了批评，并提出了一些新的术语。为了达到这一目的，在文献中的主要研究中使用的基本运动单位和运动类型的不同定义进行了彻底的调查。通过几个例子，它表明，命名的运动单元根据产生的运动类型可能会产生误导，它是更好地指定整个结构的运动类型。提出了平面曲线变换的一种分类方法。
When the existing literature on the research of scissor structures is thoroughly investigated, it is seen that different researchers use different terminologies and classifications especially for the definition of the primary units and the motion type. Some of the studies define the whole geometry based on the geometric properties of the primary scissor units and the unit lines while some other studies define it according to the loops. All these studies use different names for similar elements. This article aims to review the literature on the classification and terminology of scissor structures and represent the state of art on the studies. Tables are represented showing all approaches in the literature. In addition, the article criticizes the missing points of each terminology and definition, and proposes some new terminology. In order to arrive at this aim, different definitions of the primary scissor units and motion types used in key studies in the literature are investigated thoroughly. With several examples , it is demonstrated that naming the scissor units according to the resulting motion type might be misleading and it is better to specify the motion type for the whole structure. A classification for transformation of planar curves is presented.