Placing race in context

Placing race in context
复制标题

将种族置于背景中

DOI:
10.1080/01419870.1992.9993762
复制
发表时间:
1992
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
H. Cordero
H. Cordero
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Clara E. Rodríguez;H. Cordero

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在美国,在最近两次十年一次的人口普查中,40%的拉美裔人拒绝种族分类,如“白色”或“黑色”,并在种族上将自己归类为“黑人”。学者们认为,问题的形式导致他们这样回答;那些勾选“其他”的西班牙裔是种族中间人,也就是说,黑白混血儿或混血儿;最后,西班牙裔只是误解了这个问题。本文探讨这些解释。1989年的样本包括在纽约市机场随机挑选的240名波多黎各旅客。所用方法为描述性数据分析和多变量logit分析。比较波多黎各种族认同的三个不同方面:(a)种族是如何从外部定义的,即由采访者;(B)它是如何定义的回答者自己在开放式和封闭式的问题格式;(c)如何回答者认为它是由(白色)北美人定义的。种族歧视的决定因素。
Abstract In the United States, in the last two decennial censuses, 40 per cent of Hispanics rejected racial categories, such as ‘White’ or ‘Black’, and racially classified themselves ‘Other’. Scholars have argued that the format of the question induced them to respond this way; that those Hispanics who ticked ‘Other’ are racially intermediate, that is to say, mulatto or mestizo; and, lastly, that Hispanics simply misunderstood the question. This article examines these interpretations. The 1989 sample used consisted of 240 randomly selected Puerto Rican travellers at New York City airports. The methods used were descriptive data analysis and multivariate logit analysis. Three different dimensions of Puerto Rican racial identity are compared: (a) how race is externally defined, namely, by the interviewer; (b) how it is defined by the respondents themselves in both open‐ended and closed question formats; and (c) how the respondents think it is defined by (White) North Americans. The determinants of racial se...