Gender’s crooked path: Feminism confronts Russian patriarchy
Gender’s crooked path: Feminism confronts Russian patriarchy
复制标题
性别的弯曲道路：女权主义对抗俄罗斯父权制
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Zdravomyslova
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Temkina;E. Zdravomyslova
在这篇文章中，我们讨论了性别研究在俄罗斯的一个公共社会学的例子不稳定的发展。对于经验证据，我们主要集中在我们自己在彼得堡欧洲大学性别研究项目中的经验，但我们也参考了其他案例。我们观察到20世纪90年代的政治和学术背景如何为学术创新创造了机会，这些创新在意识形态上挑战了苏联父权制，并引发了对后苏联变革的性别批评。我们讨论了俄罗斯学术背景下性别研究的快速但部分制度化的影响，以及性别如何成为女权主义者和反女权主义者立场的总称。我们声称，由于国际社会对性别研究的支持在2000年代减少，性别研究的时尚和经济效益已经下降，只有一小部分研究人员保持对性别的女权主义方法的承诺。我们关注的是普京执政俄罗斯的最后十年中性别政治化的问题，以及女性主义研究者在分析性别意识形态中表达的新保守主义中的作用。我们研究的问题相结合的公共专业知识和学术工作在性别政治的特定领域。
In this article we discuss the uneasy development of gender studies in Russia as one example of public sociology. For empirical evidence we concentrate mainly on our own experience in the Gender Studies Program at the European University in St. Petersburg, but we also refer to the other cases. We observe how the political and academic context of the 1990s created opportunities for academic innovations that ideologically challenged Soviet patriarchy and invoked gendered criticisms of post-Soviet changes. We discuss the effects of the rapid but partial institutionalization of gender studies in the Russian academic context and how gender became the umbrella term for both feminist and anti-feminist standpoints. We claim that since international support for the gender studies diminished in the 2000s, the fashion and economic benefit of doing gender studies has declined, with only a small group of researchers maintaining their commitment to the feminist approach to gender. We focus on the politicization of gender in the last decade of Putin’s Russia and the role of feminist researchers in the analysis of the new conservatism, expressed in gender ideology. We examine the problems of combining public expertise and academic work in the particular realm of gender politics.