NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM
NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
复制
发表时间:
1978-01-01
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
VANLIERE, KD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
DUNLAP, RE;VANLIERE, KD
MethodsDuring the spring and summer of 1976 survey data were gathered from two samples of Washington state residents. First, a systematic probability sample of 1441 Washington households was drawn from the telephone directories for every community in the state. 2 Questionnaires with cover letters addressed to the name listed in the telephone directory were mailed to each of the households. However, in an effort to obtain a higher proportion of female respondents than typically obtained in heads-of-household surveys (see Dillman, et al., 1974: 753), one-half of the cover letters (every other one) requested that the questionnaire be completed by an adult female if one was present in the household, while the other half requested that the questionnaire be completed by an adult male if one was present (if an adult of the appropriate sex was not present, the addressee was requested to complete the questionnaire). 3 Using the mail survey techniques developed by Dillman (1978), we achieved a relatively good response rate: of the originall441 sample members, 208 had to be deleted for reasons of being deceased, physically incapable of completing the questionnaire, having moved and left no forwarding address or having moved out of the state. Of the remaining 1233 potential respondents, 806 returned completed usable questionnaires for a response rate of 65.4 percent. These 806 respondents should be reasonably representative of the total Washington adult population, and will be referred to as the General Public Sample (GPS). 4 We also surveyed the membership of a state-wide environmental organization in Washington during the same time period. We were given permission to draw a sample from the organization's mailing list, and we selected a systematic sample of one-half of the members by taking every other name on the list. Of the 558 individuals selected, only 16 had to be deleted for reasons of being deceased, physically incapable of completing the questionnaire, or having moved and left no forwarding address. Of the remaining 542 potential respondents, 407 returned completed questionnaires for aresponse rate of 75.1 percent. In view of the large sample size and high response rate, the respondents (hereafter referred to as the Environmental Organization Sample or EOS) should be representative of the total organizational membership. The availability of this sample is quite important, as we would logically expect individuals who have· joined an environmental organization to be more likely to endorse the NEP than members of the general public. 5 Thus, a comparison of EOS and GPS responses will pro" Vide information on the validity of the proposed NEP measuring instrument. The questionnaire used in the survey included a wide range of items. It began by asking about respondents' perceived quality of life, perception of problems facing the state and local community, support for funding state programs, etc. The second half of the questionnaire focused specifically on environmental issues, and the 12 items designed to measure the NEP were included among a list of 35 Ukert-type items concerning a range of environmental issues-pollution, population and natural resources. The set of items