Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research

Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research
复制标题

定性方法和卫生政策研究

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Dingwall
R. Dingwall
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Murphy;R. Dingwall

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本书解释了定性研究可以做什么,何时使用或委托它是明智的,以及(最关键和有争议的)如何区分好工作和坏工作。文本通过定性医疗保健研究的例子进行了充分说明。此外,作者与定量同事有共同点,拒绝定性研究是一种创造性艺术形式而不是政策科学工具的观点。因此,他们的书对定性评估研究的流行模式提出了挑战,认为定性研究人员不是驻场诗人,而是促进健康和照顾病人的伟大实际任务中的重要合作伙伴。
This volume explains what qualitative research can do, when it is sensible to use or commission it, and (most crucially and controversially) how to tell good work from bad. The text is amply illustrated with examples of qualitative health care research studies. Further, the authors share a common ground with quantitative colleagues in rejecting the idea that qualitative research is a kind of creative art form rather than a tool of policy science. Thus their book presents a challenge to fashionable models of qualitative evaluation research, in arguing that qualitative researchers are not poets in residence, but vital partners in the great practical tasks of promoting health and caring for the sick.