Scoring reliability on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III)

Scoring reliability on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1073191103010002006
复制
发表时间:
2003-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Schnakenberg-Ott, SD
Schnakenberg-Ott, SD
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ryan, JJ;Schnakenberg-Ott, SD

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

19名心理学家和19名研究生对两个韦氏成人智力量表第三版患者方案进行了评分。平均智商和指数在各组之间是相似的,但是在一个方案中,语言智商(VIQ)、操作智商(PIQ)和全量表智商(FSIQ)的范围分别为25、22和11分。两个方案加在一起,心理学家的“实际”智商的一致性百分比分别为VIQ 26.3、PIQ 36.8和FSIQ 42.1。对于学生来说,VIQ的百分比为15.8,PIQ为23.7,FSIQ为31.6。在实际智商测量的+/-1标准误差范围内的FSIQ百分比,心理学家为89.5,学生为76.3。评分误差也对指标得分产生了负面影响。两组人都对自己的得分准确性充满信心。
Nineteen psychologists and 19 graduate students scored two Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition patient protocols. Mean IQs and indexes were similar across groups, but the ranges for Verbal IQ (VIQ), Performance IQ (PIQ), and Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) on one protocol were 25, 22, and I I points, respectively For both protocols taken together, percentages of agreement with the "actual" IQs for psychologists were only 26.3 for VIQ, 36.8 for PIQ, and 42.1 for FSIQ. For students, percentages were 15.8 for VIQ, 23.7 for PIQ, and 31.6 for FSIQ. The percentages of FSIQs that fell within +/-1 standard error of measurement of the actual IQs were 89.5 for psychologists and 76.3 for students. Scoring error also had a negative impact on index scores. Both groups were confident about their scoring accuracy.