Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System

Fit for Planning? An Evaluation of the Application of Development Viability Appraisal Models in the UK Planning System
复制标题

适合规划吗?

DOI:
10.1068/b37181
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Planning and Design
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Crosby N
Crosby N
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crosby N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在有关规划义务的政策制定中越来越多地使用它的背景下,我们讨论了在英国规划系统中应用开发可行性评估模型的一些问题。讨论了更多地利用规划义务提供负担得起的住房和减轻新开发项目产生的负面外部性的影响。文中还概述了开发可行性评价模型的建立方法。确定了三种类型的问题。首先,存在一系列与内在模型和投入不确定性有关的问题,无论在什么情况下,这些问题在应用发展可行性模型时都是有问题的。其次,有一些问题是为估计或证明规划义务而建立的模型所特有的。特别是,一项仍然存在争议和不确定性的关键投入是最低地价。明确的指导可以解决这个问题。最后,也是更根本的是,由于开发地点产生规划义务的财政盈余的能力在空间和时间上的差异,在不考虑当时的地点和/或市场条件的情况下就规划义务制定规则或确定目标的政策可能会减少开发的供应和/或容易迅速过时。
In the context of its increasing use in policy formulation regarding planning obligations, we discuss a number of problematic issues in the application of development viability appraisal modelling in the UK planning system. The increased use of planning obligations to provide affordable housing and to mitigate the effects of negative externalities generated by new development is discussed. The methodology of development viability appraisal modelling is also outlined. Three types of problem are identified. First, there is a set of issues related to intrinsic model and input uncertainty that are problematic in the application of development viability modelling whatever the context. Second, there are problems that are specific to modelling for estimating or justifying planning obligations. In particular, a crucial input that remains contested and uncertain is threshold land value. Clear guidance can resolve this issue. Finally, and more fundamentally, due to spatial and temporal variation in the capacity of development sites to generate financial surpluses for planning obligations, policies that set rules or fix targets on planning obligations without regard to prevailing site and/or market conditions can reduce the supply of development and/or be prone to rapid obsolescence.
DOI: --
发表时间: 1985
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
L. A. Pyle;Robin N. Goodchild;R. Munton
通讯作者: R. Munton
规划资本主义城市
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Richard E. Foglesong
通讯作者: Richard E. Foglesong
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Morley
通讯作者: S. Morley
DOI: --
发表时间: 1996
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Henneberry;Barry Goodchild
通讯作者: Barry Goodchild
DOI: --
发表时间: 1984
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
W. Fraser
通讯作者: W. Fraser