Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration

Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration
复制标题

DOI:
10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
复制
发表时间:
2002-12-01
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Condit, DC
Condit, DC
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mittenberg, W;Patton, C;Condit, DC

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

根据美国临床神经心理学委员会成员的调查报告,可能的装病和症状夸大的基本比率。估计数是根据每年33 531起涉及人身伤害的案件作出的。(n= 6,371),残疾(n= 3,688)。刑事(n= 1,341)或医疗(n= 22,131)事项,基本费率在地理区域或实践环境之间没有差异,但与原告与被告转介的比例有关。如果转诊来源的差异得到控制,报告的发生率将高出2-4%。29%的人身伤害,30%的残疾,19%的犯罪和8%的医疗案件涉及可能的装病和症状夸大。39%的轻度头部损伤、35%的纤维肌痛/慢性疲劳、31%的慢性疼痛、27%的神经毒性和22%的电损伤索赔导致了可能的装病诊断印象。诊断得到了多种证据来源的支持。包括与病情不一致的认知障碍的严重程度(65%的病例)或模式(64%的病例),在强迫选择测试中低于经验截止值的分数(57%的病例)。记录之间的差异。自我报告和观察到的行为(56%),不可信的自我报告症状的采访(46%),不可信的变化,在重复检查的测试分数(45%),和有效性量表的客观人格测试(38%的情况下)。
Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury. (n=6,371), disability (n=3,688). criminal (n=1,341) or medical (n=22,131) matters, Base rates did not differ among geographic regions or practice settings, but were related to the proportion of plaintiff versus defence referrals. Reported rates would be 2-4% higher if variance due to referral source was controlled. Twenty-nine percent of personal injury, 30% of disability, 19% of criminal, and 8% of medical cases involved probable malingering and symptom exaggeration. Thirty-nine percent of mild head injury, 35% of fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue, 31% of chronic pain, 27% of neurotoxic, and 22% of electrical injury claims resulted in diagnostic impressions of probable malingering. Diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence. including severity (65% of cases) or pattern (64% of cases) of cognitive impairment that was inconsistent with the condition, scores below empirical cutoff's on forced choice tests (57% of cases). discrepancies among records. self-report, and observed behavior (56%) implausible self-reported symptoms in interview (46%), implausible changes in test scores across repeated examination (45%), and validity scales on objective personality tests (38% of cases).