The Future of Childhood Studies and Children & Society
The Future of Childhood Studies and Children & Society
复制标题
童年研究和儿童的未来
DOI：
10.1111/chso.12345
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Stryker R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stryker R
作为《儿童与社会》的编辑，我们很高兴推出由儿童研究领域领军人物艾伦·普劳特、斯皮罗斯·斯皮鲁和奈杰尔·帕特里克·托马斯三篇论文组成的主题版块。他们的论文源自 2016 年 7 月在谢菲尔德大学举行的儿童与青少年研究中心第六届国际会议上的主题演讲，主题为“社会、生物和物质儿童”。当这些作者反思儿童研究作为跨学科领域的未来时，他们促使我们思考这些想法如何影响和启发儿童与社会的未来。 2010 年，为庆祝该杂志成立 25 周年，当时的编辑艾莉森·詹姆斯 (Allison James)、奈杰尔·帕特里克·托马斯 (Nigel Patrick Thomas) 和马丁·伍德海德 (Martin Woodhead) 撰文，强调了“广泛的学科和方法论”，这对于该杂志的精神至关重要，该杂志是与国家儿童局合作创办并继续出版的，并且仍然“致力于了解儿童和青少年之间的多重关系以及他们所居住的不断变化的社会”（詹姆斯等人， 2010 年，第 5 页）。作为现任编辑，我们通过跨学科和方法论以及不同社会和地理背景的研究体现了这种多样性。为了反映（而不是同质化）这种混合，编辑们在这里共同思考我们对儿童研究未来至少在四个重要领域的拥抱和进步的希望——
As editors of Children & Society, we are delighted to introduce a themed section comprised of three papers by leading figures in childhood studies--Alan Prout, Spyros Spyrou, and Nigel Patrick Thomas. Their papers have been developed from keynote presentations at the Centre for the Study of Childhood and Youth’s 6th International Conference titled,“The Social, the Biological and the Material Child”, which took place at the University of Sheffield in July, 2016. As these authors reflect on the future of childhood studies as an interdisciplinary field, they have prompted us to consider how these ideas inform and inspire the future of Children & Society. Writing in 2010, in celebration of the journal’s 25th anniversary, the editors at that time-Allison James, Nigel Patrick Thomas and Martin Woodhead-highlighted ‘the wide range of academic disciplines and methodological approaches’ that are essential to the ethos of a journal which was founded, and continues to be published in collaboration with, the National Children’s Bureau, and which remains ‘committed to understanding the multiple relationships between children and young people and the changing societies they inhabit’(James and others, 2010, p. 5). As the current editors, we embody that diversity, through research that spans disciplines and methodologies, as well as varied social and geographical contexts. To reflect-rather than homogenise-that mix, the editors work together here to reflect on our hopes for the future of childhood studies to embrace and advance in at least four important areas–the