Inscriptiones Graecae ad res Romanas pertinentes.

Inscriptiones Graecae ad res Romanas pertinentes.
复制标题

Inscriptiones Graecae ad res Romanas pertinentes。

DOI:
10.1086/358940
复制
发表时间:
1906
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Edward Capps
Edward Capps
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Edward Capps

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这个重要的出版物,这将是完整的六卷,七个分册约100页,每个已经出现:汤姆。我是三个法西斯。(不列颠、日耳曼、加利亚。伊斯帕尼亚,意大利,西西利亚,撒丁岛和梅利塔,潘诺尼亚,达契亚,达尔马提亚,摩尔人,色雷斯),在1901年,1903年,1904年;汤姆。三四(比提尼亚等本都,卡帕多西亚,亚美尼亚,加拉提亚,吕西亚等Pamphylia,西里西亚,叙利亚,Palaestina,阿拉伯),在1902年,1903年,1904年,1905年。它是编辑的方向下,杰出的拉丁美洲金石学家,先生Cagnat,协助汤姆。MJ Toutain和Tom。三MG拉法叶,都是众所周知的,他们的工作在希腊金石和盟军领域。在组织和出版在一个非常低的价格这一集合的铭文,其中大部分分散在期刊和专著无法接触到大多数学生,和其余的拥抱在昂贵的卷的柏林语料库,学院的Incredible提供了一个独特的服务学术。每一个希腊和拉丁金石学、历史、制度、宗教和私人生活的学生,现在可能在他的图书馆里有大约一万五千个铭文,价格在这类出版物中是前所未有的。这些文件是用小字体印刷的。没有统一的计划,表明正字法,抄写员,和泥瓦匠的错误如下。应该采用并严格遵守一种方法,使读者在阅读文本时永远不会有疑问。大量的改进阅读和解释已被引入文本,但在这方面还有很多工作要做。在重症590 NaEKaevs 8 O/Uo,TrEKrv,with the preposterous explanation”domo Nicaea,”should give way to 8ouorTEK7WV; cf. Ath.米丝见第二十四卷,第123页。参考是语料库,如果一个题词出现在那里,往往也到一个期刊,显然是最新出版物或讨论的文件,但并不总是有良好的判断,例如,在三参考。551我是Jour.只不过是一份发现的报告!如果像Dittenberger和Michel那样充分引用文献,出版物的价值将大大提高。在出版物的最后,一个完整的索引表将部分弥补这一缺陷,事实上,这是必不可少的。注释非常简短,但切中要害,很有帮助,如果偶尔太初级。OXOLVL'a in I.第659章在这里解释西尔[2]见第一卷,第366页。29.文中提供的日期得到了充分的解释。墓志证据的日期,但是,从来没有提供,即使我们可以假设,至少一般期间的文件是由字母表示。至于在标题所示的范围内收集的完整性,很难形成判断,编辑们没有告诉我们他们对适当范围和限制的概念。人们希望
Of this important publication, which will be complete in six volumes, seven fasciculi of about 100 pages each have already appeared: of Tom. I three fasc.(Britannia, Germania, Gallia. Hispania, Italia, Sicilia, Sardinia et Melita, Pannonia, Dacia, Dalmatia, Moesia, Thracia), in 1901, 1903, 1904; of Tom. III four (Bithynia et Pontus, Cappadocia, Armenia, Galatia, Lycia et Pamphylia, Cilicia, Syria, Palaestina, Arabia), in 1902, 1903, 1904, 1905. It is edited under the direction of the distinguished Latin epigraphist, MR Cagnat, assisted in Tom. I by MJ Toutain and in Tom. III by MG Lafaye, both well known for their work in Greek epigraphy and in allied fields. In organizing and publishing at a remarkably low price this collection of inscriptions, most of them scattered in journals and monographs inaccessible to most students, and the rest embraced in the expensive volumes of the Berlin Corpus, the Academy of Inscriptions has rendered a unique service to scholarship. Every student of Greek and Latin epigraphy, history, institutions, religion, and private life may now have in his library some fifteen thousand inscriptions at a price hitherto unknown in publications of this sort. The documents are printed in minuscules. No uniform plan of indicating orthographical, scribal, and mason's errors is followed. A method by which the reader is never left in doubt as he reads the text should be adopted and rigidly adhered to. A goodly number of improved readings and restorations have been introduced into the text; but much remains to be done in this direction. In I. 590 NaEKaevs 8 O/Uo, TrEKrv, with the preposterous explanation" domo Nicaea," should give way to 8ouorTEK7WV; cf. Ath. Mitth. XXIV, p. 123. Reference is made to the Corpus if an inscription has appeared there, and often also to a journal, apparently to the latest publication or discussion of the document, but not always with good judgment; eg, the reference on III. 551 to Am. Jour. Arch. is only to a report of the find! The value of the publication would be greatly enhanced if the literature were cited fully, as in Dittenberger and Michel. A full table of concordance at the end of the publication will partly remedy this defect, and will, in fact, be indispensable. The notes are very brief, but to the point and helpful, if occasionally too elementary. OXOLVL'a in I. 659 is explained in Ditt. Syl. 2 I, p. 366, n. 29. Dates furnished by the text are adequately explained. Epigraphical evidence of date, however, is never furnished, even when we may assume that at least the general period of a document is indicated by the lettering. As to the completeness of the collection within the limits indicated by the title it is difficult to form a judgment, and the editors do not tell us their conception of its proper range and limitations. It is to be hoped