After post-development
After post-development
复制标题
后期开发后
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Pieterse
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Pieterse
后发展是与“反发展”、“超越发展”一起沿着的对发展困境的一种激进的回应。后发展侧重于发展的基本前提和动机;它与其他批评方法的区别在于它拒绝发展。问题是这是否是一个站得住脚和富有成效的立场。在这篇文章中首先采取的是后发展的主要公开立场-贫困的问题化，西方化的发展描绘，以及现代主义和科学的批判。然后，本文转向发展的话语分析，认为在后发展时代，话语分析从一种方法论转变为一种意识形态。其次，审查了替代发展和“替代发展”之间的区别。在我看来，造成这种差异如此之大的原因是反管理主义和二分法思维。文章最后讨论了后发展的政治和批判性的评估。
Along with ‘anti-development’ and ‘beyond development’, post-development is a radical reaction to the dilemmas of development. Post-development focuses on the underlying premises and motives of development; what sets it apart from other critical approaches is that it rejects development. The question is whether this is a tenable and fruitful position. Taken up first in this article are major overt positions of post-development—the problematisation of poverty, the portrayal of development as Westernisation, and the critique of modernism and science. The argument then turns to discourse analysis of development; it is argued that, in post-development, discourse analysis from a methodology turns into an ideology. Next the difference between alternative development and ‘alternatives to development’ is examined. The reasons why this difference is made out to be so large are, in my interpretation, anti-managerialism and dichotomic thinking. The article closes with a discussion of the politics of post-development and a critical assessment.