Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.1200/jco.2005.12.187
复制
发表时间:
2005-05-20
影响因子:
45.3
通讯作者:
Poupon, MF
Poupon, MF
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oudard, S;Banu, E;Poupon, MF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的米托蒽醌-糖皮质激素是目前治疗难治性前列腺癌(HRPC)的标准姑息治疗。最近的临床试验证明了紫杉醇-雌莫司汀组合的高活性。我们进行了一项随机II期研究,以评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应方法将130例转移性HRPC患者随机分为多西他赛组和米托蒽醌-泼尼松组,每组20例,观察两种方案的疗效、主要终点和安全性。(每个21天周期的第2天70 mg/m2或第2天和第9天35 mg/m2)和雌莫司汀(280 mg PO tid,第1 - 5天和第8 - 12天)或米托蒽醌12 mg/m2,每3周一次;结果127例患者可评价PSA反应和安全性。多西他赛组PSA下降≥ 50%的患者比例(67%和63%)高于MP组(18%; P = .0001)。DEP组至PSA进展的中位时间是MP组的5倍(分别为8.8和9.3 vs 1.7个月; P = .000001)。多西他赛组的总生存期(18.6和18.4个月)优于MP组(13.4个月),但差异不显著(P = 0.3)。治疗组间交叉率差异显著(A组、B组和C组分别为16%、10%和48%; P =.00001)。治疗相关毒性反应轻微,主要为血液学毒性反应。
Purpose Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP).Patients and Methods One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m(2) on day 2 or 35 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg PO tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily).Results One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A >= 50 % PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67 % and 63 %) compared with MP (18 %; P = .0001). Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16 %, 10 %, and 48 % in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P =.00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic.Conclusion The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline