Affective Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Pan-Africanist Pushback
Affective Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Pan-Africanist Pushback
复制标题
情感正义：国际刑事法院和泛非主义的抵制
DOI：
10.1111/plar.12307
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Clarke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Clarke
自2001年成立以来，国际刑事法院（ICC）一直受到非洲各国及其领导人的抵制，他们认为该法院是殖民暴力和控制的新迭代。在《情感正义》一书中，卡马里·马克辛·克拉克探讨了非洲联盟对国际刑事法院的抵制，以理论化情感在塑造当代正义形式中的作用。借鉴实地工作在海牙，非洲联盟在阿迪斯，在肯尼亚的选举后暴力的网站，和博科圣地的电路在北方尼日利亚，克拉克制定了情感正义的概念-一种情绪反应的竞争性解释的正义-跟踪如何影响变得明显的司法实践。通过详细介绍国际刑事法院对所有非洲国家的起诉的影响，她概述了对这些起诉的情感反应如何使国际刑事法院保护暴力受害者和起诉这些罪行的肇事者的使命的“客观性”受到质疑。在分析这些案件的影响时，克拉克提供了一个更全面的理论，说明人们如何表达正义是什么，以及他们这样做的机制。
Since its inception in 2001, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been met with resistance by various African states and their leaders, who see the court as a new iteration of colonial violence and control. In Affective Justice Kamari Maxine Clarke explores the African Union's pushback against the ICC in order to theorize affect's role in shaping forms of justice in the contemporary period. Drawing on fieldwork in The Hague, the African Union in Addis Ababa, sites of postelection violence in Kenya, and Boko Haram's circuits in Northern Nigeria, Clarke formulates the concept of affective justice—an emotional response to competing interpretations of justice—to trace how affect becomes manifest in judicial practices. By detailing the effects of the ICC’s all-African indictments, she outlines how affective responses to these call into question the "objectivity" of the ICC’s mission to protect those victimized by violence and prosecute perpetrators of those crimes. In analyzing the effects of such cases, Clarke provides a fuller theorization of how people articulate what justice is and the mechanisms through which they do so.
情感理论读本
DOI：
10.1215/9780822393047-005
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Highmore B
通讯作者：
Highmore B