Comparing physical, overlay, and touch screen parameter controls
Comparing physical, overlay, and touch screen parameter controls
复制标题
比较物理、覆盖和触摸屏参数控制
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Kincaid
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Melanie Tory;R. Kincaid
我们提出了一个对照实验室实验比较触摸，物理，触摸+叠加（被动手指引导）输入参数控制。具体来说，我们研究了两个目标采集和移动任务与拨号和滑块控制水平触摸屏。结果表明，物理控制是最快的，需要最少的眼睛注视时间的控制，而覆盖提高性能相比，触摸单独。速度和准确度的差异主要见于表盘控制;滑块的输入条件之间几乎没有差异。这些结果证实了物理输入设备对于参数控制任务的价值。他们还透露，叠加可以提供一些相同的好处，使他们成为一个合适的输入方法，为某些应用程序的物理控制是不切实际的。
We present a controlled laboratory experiment comparing touch, physical, and touch + overlay (passive finger guide) input for parameter control. Specifically we examined two target acquisition and movement tasks with dial and slider controls on horizontal touch screens. Results showed that physical controls were the fastest and required the least eye fixation time on the controls, while the overlay improved performance when compared to touch alone. Speed and accuracy differences were seen primarily for dial controls; there was little difference between input conditions for sliders. These results confirm the value of physical input devices for parameter control tasks. They also reveal that overlays can provide some of the same benefits, making them a suitable input approach for certain applications where physical controls are impractical.