Developing an Assessment Framework of the Recovery Calendar for COVID-19 Calamity: Based on the Data from the June 2021 Survey
Developing an Assessment Framework of the Recovery Calendar for COVID-19 Calamity: Based on the Data from the June 2021 Survey
复制标题
DOI：
10.20965/jdr.2022.p0113
复制
发表时间：
2022-01
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
S. Ohtomo;R. Kimura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Ohtomo;R. Kimura
COVID-19疫情继续对全球构成威胁。它被认为是CBRNE（化学，生物，辐射，核，爆炸）灾难，不仅造成了公共卫生危机，而且还造成了心理，社会和经济问题。恢复社会和经济活动仍然是一个紧迫的问题。这项研究开发了一个“恢复日历”的评估框架，以可视化人们从COVID-19灾难中恢复的过程。该恢复日历上的数据来自一项在线问卷调查，调查对象为10组449名受访者，按性别（男性或女性）和年龄（20岁、30岁、40岁、50岁、60岁及以上）划分。结果显示，复苏过程按以下顺序进行：认识到COVID-19对社会的影响和强制实施的限制生活方式，认识到重返工作岗位或恢复当地学校，最后认识到家庭和当地经济的复苏，尽管这些仍然处于低水平的活动。重要的是，恢复进展缓慢。调查结果还表明，宣布或解除紧急状态或“前往”旅行运动等措施影响了人们对复苏的认识。此外，对复苏的认识取决于社会人口统计数据。男性、年轻人和生活基础稳定的人更有可能从灾难中恢复过来。本研究讨论了恢复日历评估框架的适用性，以可视化人们从COVID-19灾难中恢复的过程。
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose a global threat. It is considered a CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive) disaster that has caused not only a public health crisis but also psychological, social, and economic problems. The recovery of social and economic activities remains an urgent issue. This study developed an assessment framework of the “recovery calendar” to visualize the process of people’s recognition of recovery from the COVID-19 calamity. Data on this recovery calendar were collected from an online questionnaire survey administered on a total of 449 respondents from 10 groups divided by gender (male or female) and age (20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and above). The results showed that the recovery process took place in the following order: recognition of COVID-19’s impact on society and of the imposition of a constrained lifestyle, recognition of returning to work or the resumption of local schools, and finally, recognition of the recovery of the household and local economies, although these remained at a low level of activity. Importantly, the recovery progressed slowly. The results also indicated that measures such as the declaration or lifting of the state of emergency, or the “Go To” travel campaign, affected people’s recognition of recovery. Moreover, the recognition of recovery depended on social demographics. Men, younger people, and those with a stable life base were more likely to perceive recovery from the disaster. This study discussed the applicability of the assessment framework of the recovery calendar to visualize people’s recovery process from the COVID-19 calamity.