“I can do perfectly well without a car!”
“I can do perfectly well without a car!”
复制标题
“没有车我也能过得很好！”
DOI：
10.1007/s11116-010-9315-8
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
P. Rietveld
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. V. Exel;G. Graaf;P. Rietveld
本文介绍了一项使用Q方法探索旅行者对中途旅行偏好的研究结果。受访者对42份关于旅行选择和旅行动机的意见声明进行了排序，并将汽车和公共交通作为替代旅行方式。按人因素分析发现，中长途旅行有四个不同的偏好类别：(1)偏好公共交通的首选旅行者，(2)刻意选择的旅行者，(3)以汽车为主的首选旅行者，和(4)依赖汽车的旅行者。这些偏好部分在旅行决策中的参与程度和认知努力、旅行考虑集和潜在动机方面存在差异。研究表明，对于大多数人来说，除了从A点到B点，还有更多的旅行，而且中途旅行的偏好也有相当大的异质性。讨论了减少出行需求和促进从汽车到其他出行方式转变的政策影响。
This article presents the results of a study exploring travellers’ preferences for middle-distance travel using Q-methodology. Respondents rank-ordered 42 opinion statements regarding travel choice and motivations for travel in general and for car and public transport as alternative travel modes. By-person factor analysis revealed four distinct preference segments for middle-distance travel: (1) choice travellers with a preference for public transport, (2) deliberate-choice travellers, (3) choice travellers with car as dominant alternative, and (4) car-dependent travellers. These preference segments differ in terms of the levels of involvement and cognitive effort in travel decision making, the travel consideration-set and underlying motivations. The study showed that for most people there is more to travel than getting from point A to point B, and that there is considerable heterogeneity in middle-distance travel preferences. Policy implications for reducing the need for travel and promoting a modal shift from car to other travel modes are discussed.