Development of methodology for the determination of carbon isotope ratios using gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and applications in the biodegradation of phenolic brominated flame retardants and their degradation products
Development of methodology for the determination of carbon isotope ratios using gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and applications in the biodegradation of phenolic brominated flame retardants and their degradation products
复制标题
开发使用气相色谱/燃烧/同位素比质谱测定碳同位素比的方法及其在酚类溴化阻燃剂及其降解产物的生物降解中的应用
DOI:
10.1002/rcm.7072
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Taicheng An
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jukun Xiong;Guiying Li;Taicheng An
RATIONALECompound‐specific stable carbon isotope analysis of phenolic brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and bisphenol A (BPA) has proven informative to discriminate their source and fate apportionment in the environment. However, because these compounds contain highly polar functional groups and exist as complex mixtures in environment matrices, derivatization is a necessary step, which adds additional non‐analyte carbon atoms for analyses and may alter the original stable carbon isotope ratio. It is, therefore, imperative to gain an insight into the relationship between the δ13C values of the BFRs and BPA derivatives and those of underivatized BFRs and BPA.METHODSThe δ13C values of BFRs and BPAN,O‐bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) derivatives were measured by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS). The δ13C values of the BSTFA reagent and the standard underivatized BFRs and BPA were determined using elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS). The experimentally obtained δ13C values for BFRs and BPA derivatives were then compared with the theoretically calculated values.RESULTSThe derivatization process introduces no isotopic fractionation for BFRs and BPA (the average difference between the theoretically calculated and experimentally obtained δ13C values was 0.06 ± 0.15‰, within the precision limits of the GC/C/IRMS measurements). Therefore, the δ13C values for the original underivatized BFRs and BPA were computed through a mass balance equation.CONCLUSIONSThis work offers a novel tool to research the biotic or abiotic transformation processes of BFRs and BPA in the environment and will offer a perspective for the identification of the environmental source and fate of these organic compounds. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.