An update: NIH research funding for palliative medicine 2006 to 2010.
An update: NIH research funding for palliative medicine 2006 to 2010.
复制标题
更新：NIH 2006 年至 2010 年姑息医学研究经费。
DOI：
10.1089/jpm.2012.0427
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Morrison,RSean
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gelfman,LauraP;Du,Qingling;Morrison,RSean
背景：姑息治疗的临床和教育计划正在扩大，以满足重病患者及其家属的需求。多份报告呼吁加强姑息治疗evidence bases.Objective：检查目前美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）的姑息医学研究和变化的资金，因为我们的2008 report.Methods：我们试图确定美国国立卫生研究院的姑息医学的资金从2006年至2010年分两个阶段。首先，我们搜索了美国国立卫生研究院赠款数据库RePorter，搜索关键词为“姑息治疗”、“临终关怀”、“临终关怀”和“生命终结”的赠款。其次，我们通过三种策略确定了可能获得NIH资助的姑息治疗研究人员：（1）我们从2008年至2010年发表在主要姑息医学期刊上的原始研究中提取了第一个和最后一个作者的名字;（2）我们从PubMed生成的所有发表在主要医学，护理，和使用上述关键词医学主题词（MESH）术语“姑息治疗”，“临终关怀”，“临终关怀”和“生命终结”的子专业期刊;（3）我们确定了姑息医学期刊的编辑委员会成员和姑息医学研究计划的关键成员。结果：NIH RePorter检索共获得653项赠款，作者检索共获得352项赠款。与2001年至2005年相比，国家卫生研究院资助的赠款增加了589笔（240%）。391项赠款被归类为与姑息医学相关，代表了294个独特的PI，增加了185名（269%）NIH资助的姑息医学研究人员。NIH支持了1253篇原始姑息医学研究文章中的21%。与2001年至2005年相比，资助的研究所以外的国家癌症研究所（NCI），国家护理研究所（NINR），和国家老龄化研究所（NIA）的赠款的百分比从15%增加到20%的所有赠款.Conclusions：当相比，2001-2005年，更多的姑息医学研究人员接受NIH的资金;和研究经费有所改善。然而，需要更多的举措来进一步支持姑息治疗研究。
Background:Palliative care clinical and educational programs are expanding to meet the needs of seriously ill patients and their families. Multiple reports call for an enhanced palliative care evidence base.Objective:To examine current National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding of palliative medicine research and changes since our 2008 report.Methods:We sought to identify NIH funding of palliative medicine from 2006 to 2010 in two stages. First, we searched the NIH grants database RePorter for grants with key words “palliative care,” “end-of-life care,” “hospice,” and “end of life.” Second, we identified palliative care researchers likely to have secured NIH funding using three strategies: (1) We abstracted the first and last authors' names from original investigations published in major palliative medicine journals from 2008 to 2010; (2) we abstracted these names from a PubMed generated list of all original articles published in major medicine, nursing, and subspecialty journals using the above key words Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms “palliative care,” “end-of-life care,” “hospice,” and “end of life;” and (3) we identified editorial board members of palliative medicine journals and key members of palliative medicine research initiatives. We crossmatched the pooled names against NIH grants funded from 2006 to 2010.Results:The NIH RePorter search yielded 653 grants and the author search identified an additional 352 grants. Compared to 2001 to 2005, 589 (240%) more grants were NIH funded. The 391 grants categorized as relevant to palliative medicine represented 294 unique PIs, an increase of 185 (269%) NIH funded palliative medicine researchers. The NIH supported 21% of the 1253 original palliative medicine research articles identified. Compared to 2001 to 2005, the percentage of grants funded by institutes other than the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute for Nursing Research (NINR), and the National Institute of Aging (NIA) increased from 15% to 20% of all grants.Conclusions:When compared to 2001–2005, more palliative medicine investigators received NIH funding; and research funding has improved. Nevertheless, additional initiatives to further support palliative care research are needed.