Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?
Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?
复制标题
形态效应与共享意义和共享形式的效应有区别吗？
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1431
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Feldman,LB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Feldman,LB
在即时(实验1)和长期(实验2)词汇判断任务中，比较了正字法和语义相关的启动字和形态相关的启动字的效果。形态关联在一系列主时距(32-300ms)以及主项和目标项之间时产生促进作用，且其大小随着主时距的增加而增加。语义促进和正字法抑制只出现在即时启动任务中。此外，在300ms的异步性刺激下，形态效应显著大于语义效应和正字法效应的总和，但在较短的持续时间内没有可靠的差异。将形态关联性描述为有别于语义和拼写相似性的综合影响的帐户的充分性，必须考虑质数持续时间内可加性的变化。(智力信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，保留所有权利)
Effects of orthographically and semantically related primes were compared with morphologically related primes in an immediate (Experiment 1) and a long-term (Experiment 2) lexical decision task. Morphological relatedness produced facilitation across a range of prime durations (32–300 ms) as well as when items intervened between prime and target, and its magnitude increased with prime duration. Semantic facilitation and orthographic inhibition arose only in the immediate priming task. Moreover, morphological effects were significantly greater than the sum of semantic and orthographic effects at a stimulus onset asynchrony of 300 ms but were not reliably different at shorter durations. The adequacy of an account that describes morphological relatedness as distinct from the composite effects of semantic and orthographic similarity must account for changes in additivity across prime durations.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)