Response readiness modulates the development of association-based automaticity in masked priming
Response readiness modulates the development of association-based automaticity in masked priming
复制标题
反应准备度调节掩蔽启动中基于关联的自动化的发展
DOI：
10.3758/s13414-016-1275-4
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Chen Qi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wang Yongchun;Wang Yonghui;Liu Peng;Di Meilin;Gong Yanyan;Zhao Li;Chen Qi
本研究通过两个实验探讨了刺激-反应联想自动化和反应准备在掩蔽启动运动激活中的作用。自动化协会操纵采用不同类型的刺激，和反应准备操纵通过改变相对频率的围棋试验在一个修改的去/不去任务。兼容性（兼容和不兼容），刺激类型（箭头和平行线），和测试会话（会话1，2和3）进行了操纵在高响应准备条件（实验1）和低响应准备条件（实验2）。在箭头刺激条件下，无论会话和实验如何，都发生了负相容性效应（NCE）。然而，在平行线刺激条件下，没有显着的兼容性效应（CE）出现，无论实验中的第1和第2次会议，而显着的NCE出现在实验1，而不是在实验2中的第3次会议。这些结果是一致的主张，运动激活只能发生，如果特定的刺激和特定的反应之间的关联已经自动化的先前的做法，和反应准备可以调节发展的自动性，但这种调制将有一个最小的影响，一旦协会是自动化的。这些发现也为以下假设提供了实验证据：基于联想的自动性的形成可以通过自上而下的控制来调节（例如，响应准备）。
The current study investigated the role of the automatization of stimulus and response (S-R) associations and response readiness in triggering the motor activation for masked primes in two experiments. The automatization of associations was manipulated by employing different types of stimuli, and response readiness was manipulated by varying the relative frequency of Go trials in a modified Go/No-Go task. Compatibility (compatible and incompatible), stimulus type (arrows and parallel lines), and test session (Sessions 1, 2, and 3) were manipulated in a high response-readiness condition (Experiment 1) and in a low response-readiness condition (Experiment 2). Negative compatibility effects (NCEs) occurred regardless of session and experiment in the arrow stimuli condition. However, in the parallel-line stimuli condition, no significant compatibility effect (CE) appeared regardless of the experiment in Sessions 1 and 2, whereas a significant NCE appeared in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2 in Session 3. These results are consistent with the claim that motor activation can only occur if the association between specific stimuli and specific responses has been automatized by previous practice, and response readiness can modulate the development of automaticity, but this modulation will have a minimal effect once the association is automatized. The findings also provide experimental evidence for the assumption that the formation of association-based automaticity could be modulated by top-down control (e.g., response readiness).