Null subjects, expletives and locatives in Sardinian
Null subjects, expletives and locatives in Sardinian
复制标题
撒丁语中的空主语、咒骂语和方格词
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Remberger
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Remberger
If we look at subtypes of expletive subjects, as identified by Svenonius (2002:5) for English, for example, we see that they can be pronouns, as is the case for extrapositional it or weather it, or they can consist of a locative element, like impersonal there. It is the latter in particular that will be at the centre of interest in this paper. The specific aim of this paper is to describe, interpret and analyse two subtypes of “subjectless” constructions in Sardinian that involve such a locative element, namely existential constructions and presentational impersonal constructions with intransitives. The paper will focus on the status and role of the locative element with respect to null subjects and/or expletives. More details concerning the relation between empty and overt expletives and overt locatives even in a null subject language such as Sardinian will be discussed in section 2. Sardinian displays wide diatopic variation; nevertheless it is often stated that there are roughly two main dialect areas, although these are not clearly defined and have several transitional areas. One is Logudorese in the North of the island; the other is Campidanese in the South. Thus there is a variation of forms with respect to locatives or existentials in Sardinian. Here, only the clitic locatives will be considered, which can be bi, bie / ikke, ke, nke, ank, inchi, for the Logudorese varieties, and iddhoi, ddhoi, ddhui, ddhue, ddhu / inci, ci, ince, nce for the Campidanese varieties. All varieties, however, have null subjects. In what follows I shall principally use examples with bi, most of them stemming from the mailing list Sa Limba (cf. Sa-Limba 1999-2007). The occurrences of a locative or existential element are glossed with LOC. This, however, does not mean that bi always is to be interpreted as a true locative. All examples at issue here are thetic sentences (cf. Sasse 1987) or so-called presentational clauses, i.e. constructions that do not have predicate focus, but sentence focus (Lambrecht 1994). The data under discussion are given in the following examples: