A comparison of plagiarism detection tools
A comparison of plagiarism detection tools
复制标题
抄袭检测工具的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Rademaker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jurriaan Hage;P. Rademaker
在本文中，我们比较了五种检测源代码文本抄袭的工具：JPlag、Marble、moss、Plaggie和sim。这些工具在功能和性能方面进行了比较。为了进行性能比较，我们进行了两个实验：为了比较这些工具对不同抄袭技术的敏感性，我们将这些工具应用于一组故意抄袭的程序。为了了解这些工具的精度，我们在学生作业的几个版本上运行了这些工具，并比较了结果的前10名。
In this paper we compare five tools for detecting plagiarism in source code texts: JPlag, Marble, moss, Plaggie, and sim. The tools are compared with respect to their features and performance. For the performance comparison we carried out two experiments: to compare the sensitivity of the tools for different plagiarism techniques we have applied the tools to a set of intentionally plagiarised programs. To get a picture of the precision of the tools, we have run the tools on several incarnations of a student assignment and compared the top 10’s of the results.