Smooth Kuranishi structures with trivial isotropy
Smooth Kuranishi structures with trivial isotropy
复制标题
具有微不足道各向同性的平滑 Kuranishi 结构
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Wehrheim
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Mcduff;K. Wehrheim
construction of a virtual fundamental class for any Kuranishi structure that will be outlined in the following sections. While the language of polyfolds and the proof of the regularization theorems in [HWZ1, HWZ2, HWZ3] is highly involved, it seems to be developed in full detail and is readily quotable. A survey of the basic philosophy and language is now available in [GFFW]. Just as in the construction of a Kuranishi structure for a given holomorphic curve moduli space discussed in Section 4 below, the application of the polyfold regularization approach still requires a description of the compactified moduli space as the zero set of a Fredholm section in a polyfold bundle. It is here that the polyfold approach promises the most revolutionary advance in regularization techniques. Firstly, fiber products of moduli spaces with polyfold descriptions are naturally described as zero sets of a Fredholm section over a product of polyfolds. For example, one can obtain a polyfold setup for the PSS morphism by combining the polyfold setup for SFT with a smooth structure on Morse trajectory spaces, see [AFW]. Secondly, Hofer–Wysocki–Zehnder are currently working on formalizing a “modular” approach to the polyfold axioms in such a way that the analytic setup can be given locally in domain and target for every singularity type. With that, the polyfold setup for a new moduli space that combines previously treated singularities in a different way would merely require a Deligne–Mumford type theory for the underlying spaces of domains and targets. Remark 2.3.1. While the polyfold framework is a very powerful method for constructing algebraic invariants from holomorphic curve moduli spaces, it also has some pitfalls in geometric applications. • Some caution is required with arguments involving the geometric properties of solutions after regularization. The reason for this is that the perturbed solutions do not solve a PDE but an abstract compact perturbation of the Cauchy–Riemann equation. Essentially, one can only work with the fact that the perturbed solutions can be made to lie arbitrarily close to the unperturbed solutions in any metric that is compatible with the scale-topology (e.g. any Ck-metric in the case of closed curves). • Despite reparametrizations acting scale-smoothly on spaces of maps, the question of equivariant regularization for smooth, free, proper actions remains nontrivial due to the interaction with retractions, i.e. gluing constructions. In the example of the S1-action on spaces of Floer trajectories for an autonomous Hamiltonian, the unregularized compactified Floer trajectory spaces of virtual dimension 0 may contain broken trajectories. The corresponding stratum of the quotient space,