Measuring situation awareness in command and control: comparison of methods study
Measuring situation awareness in command and control: comparison of methods study
复制标题
测量指挥和控制中的态势感知:方法研究比较
DOI:
10.1145/1362550.1362559
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Laura Rafferty
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Salmon;G. Walker;Darshna Ladva;N. Stanton;D. Jenkins;Laura Rafferty
Motivation -- This research sought to compare three different approaches for measuring Situation Awareness (SA) during a command and control scenario.
Research approach -- A total of 20 participants undertook question one of the Combat Estimate, a military planning process, in an experimental command and control test bed environment. Participant SA was measured using three different SA measures: a freeze probe technique, a post trial subjective rating technique, and a critical incident technique interview approach. Comparisons were then made between the measures of SA obtained during the study.
Findings/Design -- The results show that the freeze probe measure (SAGAT) was the only measure that had a statistically significant correlation with participant performance. The findings also demonstrate that there was no significant correlation between the three SA measures used.
Research Implications -- The findings offer validation evidence for the SAGAT approach when used to measure participant SA during a command and control task and suggest that the three approaches used view SA in a different manner.
Originality/Value -- The research explores the measurement of SA during command and control activity and makes judgements on the suitability of each method for application in this context.
Take away message -- Analogous to the different theoretical perspectives on SA presented in the literature, these findings suggest that the methods compared view and assess SA in a very different manner.