ENIGMA: crowdsourcing meets neuroscience.
ENIGMA: crowdsourcing meets neuroscience.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00005-8
复制
发表时间:
2015-05-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mohammadi, Dara
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mohammadi, Dara
How do our genetic profiles affect our brains? And what relation do the resulting phenotypes have with complex neurological and psychiatric disorders? Answers to these seemingly fundamental questions, says Paul Thompson, professor of neurology at the University of Southern California, CA, USA, lie beyond the reach of most researchers, mainly because of the expense of doing imaging and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in a large enough population to tease out the often subtle genetic effects on the brain.“Say you and I wanted to do an imaging genomics study of 30 thousand people”, he says.“We’d go to the National Institutes of Health [NIH] in the States or the Wellcome Trust in the UK and they would laugh at us—they’d say it is too expensive and that it would cost $30 million in scans alone.” In 2009, Thompson and Nick Martin, professor of genetic epidemiology at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research, QLD, Australia, came up with a solution that is now starting to provide answers. They co-founded the Enhancing Neuroimaging and Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Network—named after the code-breaking machine used by Alan Turing and colleagues during the Second World War. The network brings together researchers who are interested in cracking the thusfar elusive genotype–phenotype relations in neurological and psychiatric disorders. It boasts impressive numbers: it includes 300 scientists from 185 institutions in 33 countries who can pore through existing genomic, imaging, and clinical data from a combined 30 000 patients.