Reconsidering Bohr’s Reply to EPR
Reconsidering Bohr’s Reply to EPR
复制标题
重新考虑玻尔对 EPR 的答复
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rob Clifton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hans Halvorson;Rob Clifton
尽管玻尔对EPR论证的回答被认为是他的量子理论哲学发展的一个分水岭，但很难找到对该回答的哲学观点的清晰表述。此外，一些人声称，这一点仅仅是玻尔是一个激进的实证主义者。在本文中，我们证明这种说法是没有根据的。特别是，我们给出了玻尔对原始EPR论证的回答的数学上严格的重建，澄清了其逻辑结构，并表明它不依赖于可疑的哲学假设。相反，玻尔的回答是由他对实验现象提供“经典”和“客观”描述的承诺所决定的。
Although Bohr’s reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply’s philosophical point. Moreover, some have claimed that the point is simply that Bohr is a radical positivist. In this paper, we show that such claims are unfounded. In particular, we give a mathematically rigorous reconstruction of Bohr’s reply to the original EPR argument that clarifies its logical structure, and which shows that it does not rest on questionable philosophical assumptions. Rather, Bohr’s reply is dictated by his commitment to provide “classical” and “objective” descriptions of experimental phenomena.