Being close to risk. From proximity to connexity
Being close to risk. From proximity to connexity
复制标题
接近风险。
DOI：
10.1504/ijsd.2004.005958
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. November
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. November
到目前为止，城市空间、相关风险和邻近概念之间的关系很少受到严格的审查。然而，必须就这一问题进行讨论，特别是鉴于最近发生的灾难成为头条新闻（特别是2001年9月在纽约和图卢兹，2004年3月在马德里）。一方面，人们普遍认为，风险的后果往往在城市环境中更为严重;另一方面，不同风险的分类（工业、社会、环境风险等）在一个空间内，增加了各种灾难发生的可能性。这条推理路线将通过一个案例研究提出质疑。通过观察参与确定和管理日内瓦（瑞士）火灾风险的不同当事方之间的做法，我们将提出联系概念，作为邻近概念的补充，因为它与这一领域的实际做法关系更密切。
The relationship between urban spaces, associated risk, and the notion of proximity has until now been subject to very little critical examination. It is, however, crucial to conduct a discussion on the subject, especially in view of the latest disasters that have made the headlines (notably in New York and Toulouse in September 2001, in Madrid in March 2004). On the one hand, it is widely understood that the consequences of risk tend to be more severe in urban environments; on the other, the categorisation of different risks (industrial, social, environmental risks, etc.) within a space reinforces the probability of all kinds of disaster occurring. This line of reasoning will be questioned through a case study. By observing the practices amongst the different parties involved in identifying and managing the risk of fire in Geneva (Switzerland), we will propose the notion of connexity as a complement to that of proximity, as it is more closely related to the practices in action in this field.