Discussion: the futures of global history
Discussion: the futures of global history
复制标题
讨论：全球历史的未来
DOI：
10.1017/s1740022817000262
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
David Motadel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Drayton;David Motadel
摘要 全球历史已受到攻击。它被指控忽视国家历史和过去的“狭小空间”，成为一个与我们时代的反全球主义政治无关的精英全球主义项目，只关注流动的人和事物，并变得危险的霸权。本文表明，全球历史与国家和地方、个人、外来者和底层以及小而孤立的地方的历史交织在一起。此外，全球史直接解决了流动性和流动阻力问题，与各国历史的持续主导地位相比，它在学科上仍然相对较弱。这篇文章提供了全球历史当代习语兴起的新简史，并展望了未来，学者们可以通过合作找到替代欧洲过去的度量衡和英语历史学家主导地位的方法。它认为，我们不应该逆转“全球转向”，就像我们不应该把历史的目光只转向有产的白人一样。我们比以往任何时候都更需要它来对抗帝国和民族过去的神话，而不是从全球历史中撤退，这些神话往往是民族主义民粹主义的基础。
Abstract Global history has come under attack. It is charged with neglecting national history and the ‘small spaces’ of the past, with being an elite globalist project made irrelevant by the anti-globalist politics of our age, with focusing exclusively on mobile people and things, and with becoming dangerously hegemonic. This article demonstrates that global history is intertwined with the histories of the nation and the local, individuals, outsiders, and subalterns, and small and isolated places. Moreover, global history has directly addressed immobility and resistances to flow, and remains relatively weak in the discipline, versus the persistent dominance everywhere of national history. The article offers a new short history of the rise of the contemporary idiom of global history, and a prospect for a future in which scholars may find, through collaboration, alternatives to the European weights and measures of the past, and to the dominance of Anglophone historians. It argues that we should no more reverse the ‘global turn’ than we should return history’s gaze only to propertied white men. Rather than a retreat from global history, we need it more than ever to fight against myths of imperial and national pasts, which often underpin nationalist populisms.
底层生活：印度洋世界殖民主义传记，1790-1920
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Anderson, Clare
通讯作者：
Anderson, Clare