Oral 5-aminolevulinic acid mediated photodynamic diagnosis using fluorescence cystoscopy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A randomized, double-blind, multicentre phase II/III study

Oral 5-aminolevulinic acid mediated photodynamic diagnosis using fluorescence cystoscopy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A randomized, double-blind, multicentre phase II/III study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.03.008
复制
发表时间:
2015-06-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Shuin, Taro
Shuin, Taro
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Inoue, Keiji;Anai, Satoshi;Shuin, Taro

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:经尿道给予5-氨基乙酰丙酸(5-ALA)的六醛化形式(5-ALA己酯)后,非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的光动力学诊断(PDD)在西方国家广泛进行。在这项研究中,5-ALA的口服给药的有效性和安全性进行了评估,在一个II/III期研究的POD为NMIBC相比,那些传统的白光endoscopic diagnosis.Methods:NMIBC患者被分配到两组,口服10和20 mg/kg的5-ALA的双盲条件下。通过将主要终点设定为敏感性来评价有效性。还分析了安全性。此外,临床推荐剂量的5-ALA也进行了调查,作为一个多中心的合作临床试验,其中5个医疗机构participated.Results:所有62例入组患者完成了临床试验。PDD的敏感性(10和20 mg/kg组分别为84.4%和75.8%)高于传统内镜诊断(分别为67.5%和47.6%)(分别为p =0.014和p< 0.001)。在4例患者中发生了5次严重不良事件;而在所有事件中排除了与研究药物的因果关系。结论:本研究启动的临床试验证实了口服5-ALA后PDD对NMIBC的有效性和安全性。两种剂量的5-ALA可能都适用于临床;然而,20 mg/kg组仅通过POD检测肿瘤的比率更高,这表明该剂量更有用。(c)2015 Elsevier B. V.版权所有。
Background: Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following transurethral administration of a hexalated form of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), 5-ALA hexyl ester, is widely performed in Western countries. In this study, effectiveness and safety of the oral administration of 5-ALA is assessed in a phase II/III study of POD for NMIBC in comparison to those of conventional white-light endoscopic diagnosis.Methods: Patients with NMIBC were allocated to two groups that were orally administered 10 and 20 mg/kg of 5-ALA under the double-blind condition. Effectiveness was evaluated by setting the primary endpoint to sensitivity. Safety was also analyzed. Moreover, clinically recommended doses of 5-ALA was also investigated as an investigator-initiated multicenter cooperative clinical trial in which five medical institutions participated.Results: All 62 enrolled patients completed the clinical trial. The sensitivities of PDD were higher (84.4 and 75.8% in the 10 and 20 mg/kg-groups, respectively) than those of conventional endoscopic diagnosis (67.5 and 47.6%, respectively) (p =0.014 and p< 0.001, respectively). Five episodes of serious adverse events developed in four patients; whereas a causal relationship with the investigational agent was ruled out in all episodes.Conclusion: This investigator-initiated clinical trial confirmed the effectiveness and safety of PDD for NMIBC following oral administration of 5-ALA. Both doses of 5-ALA may be clinically applicable; however, the rate of detecting tumors only by POD was higher in the 20 mg/kg-group suggesting that this dose would be more useful. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.