Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People's Mobility and Well-Being.

Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People's Mobility and Well-Being.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z
复制
发表时间:
2018-06
期刊:
Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Swallow D
Swallow D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cinderby S;Cambridge H;Attuyer K;Bevan M;Croucher K;Gilroy R;Swallow D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

流动性是积极老龄化的一个关键方面,有助于参与和自主进入晚年生活。保持活跃可以带来多种身体和社会益处,从而带来更高水平的幸福感。随着全球城市化水平的提高以及人口结构的变化,这意味着在世界许多地区,城市人口将是老年人,挑战在于城市应如何发展以实现所谓的积极老龄化。本文报告了一项由 117 名参与者参与的联合设计研究,调查了三个城市中现有城市空间和基础设施对老年居民(55 岁以上)的流动性和福祉的相互作用。试验了一种混合方法,以确定有利于主观幸福感的地点和参与者主导的城市交通挑战解决方案。空间分析用于确定地点和基础设施中促进或损害参与者流动性和福祉的关键潜在因素。通过在每个城市进行在线和面对面调查,评估了共同设计的解决方案在更广泛的城市居民(n = 233)中的可接受性或共同效益。我们的分析确定了老年人城市流动性的三个关键的交叉和相互作用的主题问题:有形基础设施的质量;围绕城市系统和服务的交付、治理和质量的问题;以及老年人遇到的个人的态度和行为。这种确定的复杂性强化了对政策响应的需求,这些政策响应可能不一定涉及设计或改造措施,但可能会挑战对城市空间的使用和访问的看法和行为。我们的协同设计结果进一步强调,解决方案需要超越通用和无地点的解决方案,而是将特定的本地相关解决方案嵌入到固有的地理空间、人口和流程中,以确保它们与错综复杂的地点相关。本文的在线版本 (10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z) 包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。
Mobility is a key aspect of active ageing enabling participation and autonomy into later life. Remaining active brings multiple physical but also social benefits leading to higher levels of well-being. With globally increasing levels of urbanisation alongside demographic shifts meaning in many parts of the world this urban population will be older people, the challenge is how cities should evolve to enable so-called active ageing. This paper reports on a co-design study with 117 participants investigating the interaction of existing urban spaces and infrastructure on mobility and well-being for older residents (aged 55 + years) in three cities. A mixed method approach was trialled to identify locations beneficial to subjective well-being and participant-led solutions to urban mobility challenges. Spatial analysis was used to identify key underlying factors in locations and infrastructure that promoted or compromised mobility and well-being for participants. Co-designed solutions were assessed for acceptability or co-benefits amongst a wider cross-section of urban residents (n = 233) using online and face-to-face surveys in each conurbation. Our analysis identified three critical intersecting and interacting thematic problems for urban mobility amongst older people: The quality of physical infrastructure; issues around the delivery, governance and quality of urban systems and services; and the attitudes and behaviors of individuals that older people encounter. This identified complexity reinforces the need for policy responses that may not necessarily involve design or retrofit measures, but instead might challenge perceptions and behaviors of use and access to urban space. Our co-design results further highlight that solutions need to move beyond the generic and placeless, instead embedding specific locally relevant solutions in inherently geographical spaces, populations and processes to ensure they relate to the intricacies of place. The online version of this article (10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.04.002
发表时间: 2013-07-01
期刊: HEALTH & PLACE
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Gatrell, Anthony C.
通讯作者: Gatrell, Anthony C.
DOI: 10.1177/0261018311430457
发表时间: 2012-11-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Buffel, Tine;Phillipson, Chris;Scharf, Thomas
通讯作者: Scharf, Thomas
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163
发表时间: 2011-07-26
期刊: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Huber, Machteld;Knottnerus, J Andre;Smid, Henk
通讯作者: Smid, Henk
DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x12001110
发表时间: 2014-03-01
期刊: AGEING & SOCIETY
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Green, Judith;Jones, Alasdair;Roberts, Helen
通讯作者: Roberts, Helen
DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x16001082
发表时间: 2018-02-01
期刊: AGEING & SOCIETY
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Hallgrimsdottir, Berglind;Stahl, Agneta
通讯作者: Stahl, Agneta