Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.
Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.
复制标题
通过传统治疗和超声增强治疗来修复残余的僵直错误：单例实验研究。
DOI：
10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0261
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Whalen,DouglasH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Preston,JonathanL;McAllister,Tara;Phillips,Emily;Boyce,Suzanne;Tiede,Mark;Kim,JackieSihyun;Whalen,DouglasH
PurposeThe目的的研究是如何超声视觉反馈（UVF）治疗影响语音学习的儿童与残余的语音错误影响/ESTA/。MethodTwelve儿童，年龄9-14岁，接受治疗的声乐/ESTA/错误在多基线跨学科设计比较8届UVF治疗和8届传统（无生物反馈）治疗。所有参与者都暴露于两种治疗条件下，顺序在参与者之间平衡。要监测进展，天真的听众评价的准确性，声乐/vacuum/在未经处理的words.ResultsAfter的前8届会议，儿童谁收到UVF判断产生更准确的声乐/vacuum/比那些谁收到传统的治疗。在第二个8个疗程后，参与者内的比较显示了治疗反应的个体差异。然而，组水平的比较显示更大的准确性，在儿童的治疗顺序是UVF其次是传统的治疗与儿童谁收到了相反的治疗order.ConclusionOn平均，8届UVF更有效的比8届传统的治疗声乐/发音/错误。在学习的早期而不是后期阶段提供UVF时，也观察到了更好的结果。然而，对紫外线辐射和传统治疗的反应仍存在显著的个体差异，需要进行更大规模的组水平研究。补充材料https：doi.org/10.23641/asha.8206640
PurposeThe aim of the study was to examine how ultrasound visual feedback (UVF) treatment impacts speech sound learning in children with residual speech errors affecting /ɹ/.MethodTwelve children, ages 9–14 years, received treatment for vocalic /ɹ/ errors in a multiple-baseline across-subjects design comparing 8 sessions of UVF treatment and 8 sessions of traditional (no-biofeedback) treatment. All participants were exposed to both treatment conditions, with order counterbalanced across participants. To monitor progress, naïve listeners rated the accuracy of vocalic /ɹ/ in untreated words.ResultsAfter the first 8 sessions, children who received UVF were judged to produce more accurate vocalic /ɹ/ than those who received traditional treatment. After the second 8 sessions, within-participant comparisons revealed individual variation in treatment response. However, group-level comparisons revealed greater accuracy in children whose treatment order was UVF followed by traditional treatment versus children who received the reverse treatment order.ConclusionOn average, 8 sessions of UVF were more effective than 8 sessions of traditional treatment for remediating vocalic /ɹ/ errors. Better outcomes were also observed when UVF was provided in the early rather than later stages of learning. However, there remains a significant individual variation in response to UVF and traditional treatment, and larger group-level studies are needed.Supplemental Materialhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8206640