Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.

Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/08989620500217495
复制
发表时间:
2005-07-01
期刊:
Accountability in research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Pimple, Kenneth D
Pimple, Kenneth D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adams, Douglas;Pimple, Kenneth D

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

200年来,犯罪学家的理论认为,违法和犯罪行为源于异常的心理状态(如非理性或不道德)和/或产生这些心理状态的社会条件。这种理论视角在大多数理解和控制研究不端行为的努力中被重复,但并没有产生效果。最近,出现了犯罪学的观点,强调情境因素,增加或限制非法或轻率行为的机会。这些所谓的“机会”理论已被证明在降低犯罪率方面具有实用价值。我们探讨这些新的理论的承诺,为负责任的研究行为(RCR)。
For 200 years, criminologists theorized that delinquent and criminal acts arise from deviant psychological states (such as irrationality or immorality) and/or social conditions that produce these psychological states. This theoretical perspective, which is being duplicated in most efforts to understand and control research misconduct, has not been productive. More recently, criminological perspectives have emerged, emphasizing situational factors that enhance or restrict the opportunity for illegal or imprudent behavior. These so-called "opportunity" theories have been shown to have practical value in reducing crime rates. We explore the promise of these newer theories for the responsible conduct of research (RCR).