Are all Communities Communities in the Mind?
Are all Communities Communities in the Mind?
复制标题
所有社区都是头脑中的社区吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Pahl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Pahl
作者和他的同事们在大约45年的时间里对社区进行了研究，重新考虑了“心中的社区”的意义是如何被不充分地理解的。克利福德·格尔茨（Clifford Geertz）对“近体验”和“远体验”的区分被用来强化社区社会学家（包括弗兰肯伯格）的某些假设和方法。从20世纪60年代末的commonity研究的重要性下降的一些可能的解释进行了讨论的背景下，在20世纪70年代和80年代的社会学分析的社会阶层的日益中心。本文参考了Liz Spencer和作者最近对个人社区的研究，以说明如何实现“经验近”和“经验远”方法之间的省略。得出的结论是，推定的社区在地面上，往往是基于唯物主义的假设，不应该在概念上优先于真实的社区在心中。
Studies of community undertaken over a period of some forty-five years by the author and his colleagues are re-considered to show how the significance of ‘communities-in-the-mind’ has been inadequately appreciated. The distinction made by Clifford Geertz between ‘experience-near’ and ‘experience-distant’ is used to sharpen up certain assumptions and approaches of community sociologists, including Frankenberg. Some possible explanations for the decline in the perceived importance of comminity studies from the late 1960s are discussed in the context of the growing centrality of social class in sociological analysis in the 1970s and 1980s. Reference is made to recent research on personal communities by Liz Spencer and the author to illustrate how an ellision between ‘experience-near’ and ‘experience-distant’ approaches may be achieved. It is concluded that the imputed community-on-the-ground, often based on materialistic assumptions, should not be conceptually privileged over the real community-in-the-mind.