Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Effects on Cardiovascular Physiology: A Systematic Review and Agenda for Future Research.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Effects on Cardiovascular Physiology: A Systematic Review and Agenda for Future Research.
复制标题
创伤后应激障碍治疗对心血管生理学的影响:系统回顾和未来研究议程。
DOI:
10.1002/jts.22637
复制
发表时间:
2021-04
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Norr AM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bourassa KJ;Hendrickson RC;Reger GM;Norr AM
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is linked to both altered physiological functioning and poorer cardiovascular health outcomes, including an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular-related mortality. An important question is whether interventions for PTSD might ameliorate the risk for poorer health by improving cardiovascular physiological intermediaries. To begin to characterize the literature addressing this question, we conducted a systematic review of empirical studies examining the impact of PTSD interventions on cardiovascular physiological intermediaries, including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cardiac impedance, and subclinical atherosclerosis. Outcomes included both tonic (i.e., resting) cardiovascular functioning and cardiovascular reactivity (CVR). A total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was mixed evidence regarding whether PTSD treatment improved tonic cardiovascular functioning. There was stronger evidence that PTSD treatments reduced CVR to trauma-related stressors, particularly for higher-quality studies of cognitive behavioral interventions. No studies examined cardiac impedance or subclinical atherosclerosis. The studies had a high degree of heterogeneity in the populations sampled and interventions tested. Moreover, they generally included small sample sizes and lacked control conditions. Interventions for PTSD may improve cardiovascular physiological outcomes, particularly CVR to trauma cues, although additional methodologically rigorous studies are needed. We outline changes to future research that would improve the literature regarding this important question, including the more frequent use of control groups and larger sample sizes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Burg MM;Brandt C;Buta E;Schwartz J;Bathulapalli H;Dziura J;Edmondson DE;Haskell S
通讯作者:
Haskell S
影响因子:
24
作者:
Fox, Kim;Borer, Jeffrey S.;Tendera, Michal
通讯作者:
Tendera, Michal
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Edmondson D;Kronish IM;Shaffer JA;Falzon L;Burg MM
通讯作者:
Burg MM
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Ahmadi, Naser;Moss, Lori;Atre-Vaidya, Nutan
通讯作者:
Atre-Vaidya, Nutan
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Dunne, Rachael Louise;Kenardy, Justin;Sterling, Michele
通讯作者:
Sterling, Michele