Reply to ‘Known unknowns of sex differences in cardiovascular physiology ? can arterial waveforms provide answers?’
Reply to ‘Known unknowns of sex differences in cardiovascular physiology ? can arterial waveforms provide answers?’
复制标题
回复“心血管生理学中性别差异的已知未知数?动脉波形可以提供答案吗?”
DOI:
10.1097/hjh.0000000000003146
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Junichiro Hashimoto
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kaname Tagawa;Junichiro Hashimoto
We thank Picone et al.[1] for their interest in our recent article [2]. In our recent article, we demonstrated that aortic diastolic pressure decay is accelerated in women and mediates the relationship between sex and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR). Considering that recent clinical assessments of central hemodynamics are based mainly on systolic pressure contour (eg augmentation index)[3, 4], our findings showing the importance of diastolic pressure contour might identify novel targets for coronary heart disease prevention [5].As Picone et al.[1] pointed out, the SEVR measured noninvasively may be overestimated compared with that measured invasively [6]. A noninvasively measured SEVR does not account for the intraventricular diastolic pressure and proper allocation to systole and diastole of left ventricular isometric contraction and relaxation, respectively [7]. However, a noninvasively measured SEVR has a high correlation coefficient (0.85) with left ventricular subendocardial to subepicardial blood flow ratio [8]. Moreover, a noninvasive aortic diastolic pressure decay index appears to be no different from an invasive one [7]. Namely, the noninvasive assessments of SEVR and aortic diastolic pressure decay index used in our study are valid and our article provides direct evidence that the predisposition to myocardial ischemia in women is attributable to accelerated diastolic pressure decay.