Ethical considerations of urban ecological design and planning experiments
Ethical considerations of urban ecological design and planning experiments
复制标题
城市生态设计与规划实验的伦理考量
DOI：
10.1002/ppp3.10204
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Engebretson, Jesse
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pataki, Diane E.;Santana, Carlos G.;Hinners, Sarah J.;Felson, Alexander J.;Engebretson, Jesse
植物科学家和城市规划设计专业人士越来越多地在跨学科团队中合作，将科学实验融入公共和社会城市空间。然而，无论是管理科学实验的程序伦理，还是城市设计和规划实践的职业伦理，都没有充分考虑到城市生态实验对当地居民和社区可能产生的影响。参与设计和规划团队的科学家作为决策者，必须相应地扩大他们的伦理考虑范围。相反，从事生态实验的实践者承担了知识产生所固有的道德责任。为了避免对城市的人类和非人类居民造成潜在的伤害，同时保持研究和实践中的科学和专业诚信，城市生态规划和设计需要一个综合的伦理框架。总结虽然有许多伦理和程序指南可供希望为决策和公共政策提供信息的科学家使用，城市生态学家越来越多地融入规划和设计团队，将科学测量和实验融入城市景观。这些科学家不仅为决策提供信息，他们自己也是决策者。因此，研究人员在设计和进行生态设计和规划实验时，承担了科学程序伦理之外的额外道德义务。我们描述了日益增长的城市生态设计和规划领域，并提出了一个框架，以扩大跨学科团队合作的社会生态研究人员和城市从业者的伦理考虑。借鉴现有的伦理框架，从一系列学科，我们概述了可能的方式，生态学家，社会科学家和从业者应该扩大他们的工作的传统伦理考虑，以确保城市居民，社区和非人类实体不受伤害的研究人员和从业者履行其个人义务，客户，市政当局和科学实践。我们提出了一个综合框架，以帮助在研究，实践和教育的道德守则的发展，综合城市生态，社会环境科学，设计和规划。
Societal Impact StatementIt is increasingly common for plant scientists and urban planning and design professionals to collaborate on interdisciplinary teams that integrate scientific experiments into public and social urban spaces. However, neither the procedural ethics that govern scientific experimentation, nor the professional ethics of urban design and planning practice, fully account for the possible impacts of urban ecological experiments on local residents and communities. Scientists that participate in design and planning teams act as decision‐makers, and must expand their domain of ethical consideration accordingly. Conversely, practitioners who engage in ecological experiments take on the moral responsibilities inherent in generation of knowledge. To avoid potential harm to human and non‐human inhabitants of cities while maintaining scientific and professional integrity in research and practice, an integrated ethical framework is needed for urban ecological planning and design.SummaryWhile there are many ethical and procedural guidelines for scientists who wish to inform decision‐making and public policy, urban ecologists are increasingly embedded in planning and design teams to integrate scientific measurements and experiments into urban landscapes. These scientists are not just informing decision‐making – they are themselves acting as decision‐makers. As such, researchers take on additional moral obligations beyond scientific procedural ethics when designing and conducting ecological design and planning experiments. We describe the growing field of urban ecological design and planning and present a framework for expanding the ethical considerations of socioecological researchers and urban practitioners who collaborate on interdisciplinary teams. Drawing on existing ethical frameworks from a range of disciplines, we outline possible ways in which ecologists, social scientists, and practitioners should expand the traditional ethical considerations of their work to ensure that urban residents, communities, and non‐human entities are not harmed as researchers and practitioners carry out their individual obligations to clients, municipalities, and scientific practice. We present an integrated framework to aid in the development of ethical codes for research, practice, and education in integrated urban ecology, socioenvironmental sciences, and design and planning.
登录
查看更多内容
科学和倡导是不同的——我们需要保持这种方式
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
L. Nielsen
通讯作者：
L. Nielsen
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
L. Ogden
通讯作者：
L. Ogden
动物同胞：我们对其他动物的义务
DOI：
10.1215/00318108-8809971
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
The Philosophical Review
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. Jamieson
通讯作者：
D. Jamieson
评估生态领域研究中的伦理权衡
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
K. Parris;S. McCall;M. McCarthy;B. Minteer;K. Steele;S. Bekessy;Fabien Medvecky
通讯作者：
Fabien Medvecky
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
FARNSWORTH, EJ;ROSOVSKY, J
通讯作者：
ROSOVSKY, J