Dependency and development in Latin America
Dependency and development in Latin America
复制标题
拉丁美洲的依赖与发展
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-349-16847-7_11
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
F. Cardoso
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Cardoso
众所周知，帝国主义资本主义理论在列宁的著作中得到了最重要的论述。这不仅是因为列宁试图解释发生在19世纪最后10年和20世纪头10年的资本主义经济转型，而且主要是因为他的解释中包含的政治和历史含义。事实上，列宁的帝国主义理论的描述性论点是从霍布森的分析中借来的。其他作家已经提出了资本主义经济和国家国际扩张的证据。然而，列宁在马克思观点的启发下，能够收集证据，证明如果我们不考虑与经济因素密切相关的政治和历史方面，经济扩张是毫无意义的。在列宁看来，帝国主义是资本主义生产方式的一种新形式。这种新形式不能被视为一种不同的经济组织模式，因为以生产资料私有制为基础的资本积累和对劳动力的剥削仍然是这种制度的基本特征。但它的意义是资本主义的一个新阶段。
The theory of imperialist capitalism, as is well known, has so far attained its most significant treatment in Lenin’s works. This is not only because Lenin attempts to explain transformations of the capitalist economies that occurrred during the last decade of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth, but is mainly because of the political and historical implications contained in his interpretations. In fact, the descriptive arguments of Lenin’s theory of imperialism were borrowed from Hobson’s analysis. Other writers had already presented evidence of the international expansion of the capitalist economies and nations. Nevertheless, Lenin, inspired by Marx’s views, was able to bring together evidence to the effect that economic expansion is meaningless if we do not take into consideration the political and historical aspects with which economic factors are intimately related. From Lenin’s perspective, imperialism is a new form of the capitalist mode of production. This new form cannot be considered a different mode of economic organization, insofar as capital accumulation based on private ownership of the means of production and exploitation of the labor force remain the basic features of the system. But its significance is that of a new stage of capitalism.