Rationale for "cultural" native patient navigators in Indian country.

Rationale for "cultural" native patient navigators in Indian country.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s13187-014-0684-0
复制
发表时间:
2014-09
期刊:
Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lindstrom D
Lindstrom D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Harjo LD;Burhansstipanov L;Lindstrom D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

“土著导航员和癌症连续体”(NNACC)是一项基于社区的参与性研究,由国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所(2008-2014)授予。该研究项目的合作伙伴是五个组织,这些组织在美国印第安人社区有着悠久的成功参与历史,或者是联邦政府承认的部落。他们是美国原住民癌症研究公司,CO(NACR)、密歇根州部落间理事会,Incorporated,MI(ITCMI)、拉皮德城地区医院,SD(RCRH)、大平原部落主席健康委员会,SD(GPTCHB)和马斯科吉(克里克)国家,OK(MCN)(在本CPBR研究中称为“合作伙伴”)。NNACC研究使用了来自每个社区环境的本地患者导航员(NPN),他们是非专业患者导航员(即,没有直接在临床环境中工作)。非专业国家方案网络在实施教育课程方面非常成功,在必要时通过诊断和治疗向参与者介绍筛查和导航过程。许多人质疑为什么需要一个熟悉当地文化和习俗以及美洲印第安人在各自社区获得的医疗保健系统的当地社区导航员。虽然有很多原因,但最常见的五个[1]如下:
“Native Navigators and the Cancer Continuum”(NNACC) was a community-based participatory research study awarded by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (2008–2014). The partners for the research project were five organizations that have a long history of successful engagement in the American Indian community or are federally recognized tribes. They are Native American Cancer Research Corporation, CO (NACR), Intertribal Council of Michigan, Incorporated, MI (ITCMI), Rapid City Regional Hospital, SD (RCRH), Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board, SD (GPTCHB), and Muscogee (Creek) Nation, OK (MCN)(referred to as the “Partners” in this CPBR study). The NNACC study utilized native patient navigators (NPNs) who are lay patient navigators (ie, none work directly for a clinical setting) from each community setting. The lay NPNs were very successful in implementing education sessions, referring participants to screening and navigating the process when necessary through diagnosis and treatment. Many people question why there is a need for a navigator from the local community who is familiar with local culture and customs and health care systems accessed by American Indians (AIs) in their respective communities. Although there are many reasons, the five most common are [1] as follows:
DOI: 10.1053/sonu.2001.25950
发表时间: 2001-08-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Burhansstipanov, L;Hollow, W
通讯作者: Hollow, W
DOI: 10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_11
发表时间: 2005-03-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Christopher, S
通讯作者: Christopher, S