Rethinking Food Production–Consumption: Integrative Perspectives

Rethinking Food Production–Consumption: Integrative Perspectives
复制标题

重新思考食品生产-消费:综合视角

DOI:
10.1111/1467-9523.00216
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
D. Goodman
D. Goodman
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Goodman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

继 1990 年代初期的一些初步尝试和最近对商品系统分析的重建工作之后,现在有进一步令人鼓舞的迹象表明,消费转向已经在其他社会科学领域引起了轰动,并开始在农业食品研究中得到承认。事实上,消费问题,表现为对粮食供应的系统性焦虑和动荡的政治,已经变得太突出而不容忽视。以西欧疯牛病大流行和美国大肠杆菌 O157: H7 疫情为代表的反复出现的食品恐慌的时间顺序现在已经非常熟悉了。然而,尽管消费在当代非常突出,但它在很大程度上仍然是农产品研究中的一个理论上的黑匣子。此外,尽管代谢媒介在食品恐慌中如此明显,但生产和消费的分析类别很少被整体阐明。关于所谓质量转向的文献的爆炸式增长进一步强化了消费的重要性,质量转向包括有机生产、其他替代农产品网络、质量保证计划以及使当地食品增值的领土战略。在欧洲,这项研究的背景是粮食恐慌引发的公众辩论,以及共同农业政策逐渐从狭隘的部门生产主义目标转向更加内生和多维的农村发展政策。
Following some initial forays in the early 1990's and more recent reconstructive work on commodity systems analysis, there are now further encouraging signs that the consumption turn, already animating other social science fields, is beginning to be acknowledged in agro-food studies. Indeed, consumption matters, manifest in systemic anxieties about food provision and a turbulent politics, simply have become too prominent to be ignored. The chronology of recurrent food scares, epitomized by the mad cow pandemic in Western Europe and E. coli O157: H7 outbreaks in the United States, is by now very familiar. Yet, for all its contemporary prominence, consumption is still very much a theoretical black box in agro-food studies. Furthermore, despite the metabolic vectors so evident in food scares, the analytical categories of production and consumption are rarely articulated holistically. The salience of consumption has been further reinforced by the explosive growth of literature on the so-called quality turn, which comprehends organic production, other alternative agro-food networks, quality assurance schemes, and territorial strategies to valorize local food products. In Europe, this research is contextualized by public debate aroused by food scares and the gradual redirection of the Common Agricultural Policy from narrowly sectoral productivist goals towards more endogenous and multi-dimensional policies of rural development.