Effect of a Scoring Rubric on the Review of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.
Effect of a Scoring Rubric on the Review of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.
复制标题
评分标准对科学会议摘要审查的影响。
DOI：
10.1007/s11606-020-05960-6
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Linsky,AmyM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mitchell,NiaS;Stolzmann,Kelly;Benning,LaurenV;Wormwood,JolieB;Linsky,AmyM
我们分析了2014年至2018年提交的所有摘要，2014-2016年指定为“旧”，2017-2018年指定为“新”标题期。我们计算了每个摘要-评审员组合的综合得分，作为评审员为给定摘要提供的四个单独标准得分（重要性，方法，结论和写作）的平均值。我们计算每个摘要的最终得分，作为该摘要所有提交评论的综合得分的未加权平均值。
METHODSWe analyzed all abstracts submitted from 2014 to 2018, with 2014–2016 designated as “old” and 2017–2018 as “new” rubric periods. We calculated the composite score for each abstract-reviewer combination as the mean of the four individual criteria scores (Importance, Methods, Conclusions, and Writing) provided by a reviewer for a given abstract. We calculated the final score for each abstract as the unweighted mean of the composite scores from all submitted reviews for that abstract.