Fat Graft Enhanced With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: Clinical, Histological, and Instrumental Evaluation

Fat Graft Enhanced With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: Clinical, Histological, and Instrumental Evaluation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/asj/sjz292
复制
发表时间:
2020-09-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Calabrese, Claudio
Calabrese, Claudio
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gentile, Pietro;Kothari, Ashutosh;Calabrese, Claudio

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:脂肪干细胞增强的脂肪移植物(FG-e-ASCs)已被用于乳腺切除术后放疗、乳房软组织缺损、溃疡和物质损失的结局。目的:本研究的目的是评价研究组(SG)在隆乳术中使用FG-e-ASCs改善美观方面的安全性和有效性,并将结果与对照组(CG)进行比较。方法:共有46名乳腺发育不良患者接受了FG-e-ASC治疗,将结果与用未经脂肪来源的干细胞(FG-ne-ASC)增强的脂肪移植物处理的CG(n = 30)的结果进行比较。术前评价包括完整的临床评价、摄影评估、软组织磁共振成像、超声和乳腺X线摄影。术后随访时间分别为1、3、7、12、24、48周,之后每年随访一次。结果:3年后,FG-e-ASCs治疗组的轮廓恢复和三维体积维持率为58%,而FG-ne-ASCs治疗组的轮廓恢复和三维体积维持率为29%。在67.4%(n = 31)接受FG-e-ASC治疗的隆乳患者中,我们观察到36个月后乳房轮廓恢复,3D体积增加10.3 mm,而在接受FG-ne-ASC治疗的CG患者中仅观察到20.0%(n = 6)。SG组的容积持续性高于CG组(P < 0.0001)。结论:在本系列病例中使用FG-e-ASCs是安全有效的。
Background: Fat graft enhanced with adipose-derived stem cells (FG-e-ASCs) has been utilized in outcomes of radiotherapy after mastectomy, breast soft tissue defects, ulcers, and loss of substance. The authors present their experience utilizing FG-e-ASCs in breast augmentation.Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a study group (SG) regarding utilization of FG-e-ASCs in breast augmentation for aesthetic improvement, comparing the results with a control group (CG).Methods: A total of 46 patients affected by breast hypoplasia were treated with FG-e-ASCs, comparing results with those of a CG (n = 30) treated with fat graft not enhanced with adipose-derived stem cells (FG-ne-ASCs). The preoperative evaluation included a complete clinical evaluation, a photographic assessment, magnetic resonance imaging of the soft tissue, ultrasound, and mammography. Postoperative follow-up took place at 1, 3, 7, 12, 24, and 48 weeks and then annually.Results: The patients treated with FG-e-ASCs showed 58% maintenance of the contour restoring and of 3-dimensional (3D) volume after 3 years compared with the patients of the CG treated with FG-ne-ASCs, who showed 29% maintenance. In 67.4% (n = 31) of breast augmentations treated with FG-e-ASCs, we observed a restoration of the breast contour and an increase of 10.3 mm in the 3D volume after 36 months, which was observed in only 20.0% (n = 6) of patients in the CG treated with FG-ne-ASCs. Volumetric persistence in the SG was higher than that in the CG (P < 0.0001 SG vs CG).Conclusions: Utilization of FG-e-ASCs was safe and effective in this series of cases performed.