From demand curves to public policy: introduction to the special issue on behavioral economics.
From demand curves to public policy: introduction to the special issue on behavioral economics.
复制标题
从需求曲线到公共政策：行为经济学特刊介绍。
DOI：
10.1002/jeab.8
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Hackenberg,TimothyD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hackenberg,TimothyD
2011年，国际行为分析协会科学委员会在芝加哥主办的一次会议上首次提出了这一问题的论文。这次名为“行为经济学：从需求曲线到公共政策”的会议，是为了抓住会议论文所涵盖的广泛主题，并在本期中得到很好的代表。行为经济学和行为分析的结合并不是什么新鲜事。富有成效的互动跨越了40年，一些开创性的论文出现在本杂志上(赫什，1980,1984；拉克林和克拉斯诺夫，1983)。作为该领域(或至少该领域与行为分析最直接相交的部分)增长的一个切实指标，该杂志1995年的一期刊登了10篇关于行为经济学的论文，主题从选择和折扣到行为药理学和行为生态学。行为经济学和行为分析之间的生产趋势，在1995年的问题上很明显，一直延续到今天。除了一些在行为分析方面具有很强经验基础的分支(例如，折扣、需求函数)的持续发展外，该领域还涌现出一些新的分支，最引人注目的是与大脑、遗传学和社会行为之间有希望的新接口。这种富有成效的新旧结合在本期中得到了展示。有几篇论文围绕着延迟折扣这一主题展开。鉴于行为分析中贴现现象的深层根源，这种强调是适当的。事实上，对经典经济理论最初的违反之一就是偏好
The papers comprising this issue were first presented as part of a meeting sponsored by the Science Board of the Association for Behavior Analysis, International, in Chicago, 2011. The conference, entitled “Behavioral Economics: From Demand Curves to Public Policy,” was so named to capture a breadth of topics covered by the papers at the meeting, and well represented in the present issue.The coupling of behavioral economics and behavior analysis is not new. Productive interactions span four decades, with some of the seminal papers appearing in this journal (Hursh, 1980, 1984; Rachlin & Krasnoff, 1983). As a tangible indicator of the growth of the field (or at least the part of the field intersecting most directly with behavior analysis), a 1995 issue of the journal featured 10 papers on behavioral economics, on topics ranging from choice and discounting to behavioral pharmacology and behavioral ecology. The productive trends between behavioral economics and behavior analysis, apparent in the 1995 issue, have continued to the present day. In addition to the sustained development of some branches with strong empirical roots in behavior analysis (eg, discounting, demand functions), the field has sprouted some new branches, most notably promising new interfaces with the brain, with genetics, and with social behavior. This productive mix of old and new is on display in the current issue. Several of the papers cluster around the topic of delay discounting. This emphasis is appropriate given the deep roots of discounting phenomena in behavior analysis. Indeed, among the initial violations of classical economic theory were the preference