Editorial: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Reporting Race and Ethnicity in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology.
Editorial: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Reporting Race and Ethnicity in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology.
复制标题
社论：多样性、公平和包容性：在儿科心理学杂志上报道种族和民族。
DOI：
10.1093/jpepsy/jsab063
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Wu,YelenaP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Palermo,TonyaM;Alderfer,MelissaA;Boerner,KatelynnE;Hilliard,MarisaE;Hood,AnnaM;Modi,AvaniC;Wu,YelenaP
在过去的一年里，美国发生了针对系统性黑人种族主义的内乱、抗议和骚乱，包括警察杀害布雷欧娜·泰勒、雷沙德·布鲁克斯和以利亚·麦克莱恩，当代对阿莫德·阿贝里的私刑，以及明尼苏达州警察在逮捕乔治·弗洛伊德时公开杀害他引发的国际催化剂，这些事件都迫切需要在各种情况下解决种族主义问题。这些悲惨的不公正现象之所以得以曝光，是因为旁观者勇敢地拍下了视频，而这只是根深蒂固的种族主义的冰山一角。种族主义渗透到世界各地的生活、机构、司法和医疗体系的各个方面。与《儿科心理学杂志》（JPP）相关的是，迫切呼吁在心理科学中颠覆种族主义（Buchanan et al., 2020; Roberts et al., 2020），这可能发生在科学的指导、报告、审查和传播中。正如几位学者所强调的那样（例如，布坎南等人，2020），在系统层面上需要拆除白人至上主义，因为目前的做法偏向于白人学者和白人社区，因此不具有代表性。如果不做出改变，就会削弱心理科学在缩小种族和族裔群体之间持续存在的身心健康差异方面取得有意义进展的潜在影响。期刊在这个把关过程中扮演着重要的角色，在这个过程中，编辑和审稿人的行为决定了哪些科学被传播，并塑造了科学的实施和报道方式。JPP加入了其他生物医学和心理学期刊（例如，Novins等人，2020;Pachter, 2020），致力于成为一份反种族主义期刊。我们承认，JPP必须做更多的工作来增加儿童心理学研究的代表性，支持多样性，并鼓励使用明确纳入社会背景的框架（Matsui et al., 2020）。为了实现这一目标，JPP编辑团队的成员组成了一个反种族主义工作组，包括编辑、副编辑和助理编辑。这篇社论报道了工作组的第一个项目——为提交给JPP的论文中报告种族和民族问题制定作者和审稿人指导。为了指导这项工作，我们的工作组审查了关键的社论、指导方针和
Events over the past year related to the civil unrest, protests, and riots against systemic racism toward Black people in the United States, including the police killings of Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and Elijah McClain, the modern-day lynching of Ahmaud Arbery, and the international catalyst triggered by the public murder of George Floyd during his arrest by Minnesota police officers, has brought an urgency in addressing racism in various contexts. These tragic injustices, only brought to light because bystanders courageously captured videos, represent just the tip of the iceberg of deeply entrenched racism that penetrates all aspects of life, institutions, and judicial and healthcare systems around the world. Of relevance to the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP) are urgent calls to upend racism in psychological science (Buchanan et al., 2020; Roberts et al., 2020), which can occur in conducting, reporting, reviewing, and disseminating science. As highlighted by several scholars (eg, Buchanan et al., 2020), a dismantling of White supremacy is needed at the systems level because current practices are biased toward White scholars and White communities, and thus are not representative. If changes are not made, it reduces the potential impact of psychological science to make meaningful progress in diminishing persistent physical and mental health disparities across racial and ethnic groups. Journals play an important role in this gatekeeping process where the actions of editors and reviewers determine which science is disseminated and shape how the science is conducted and reported. JPP joins other biomedical and psychology journals (eg, Novins et al., 2020; Pachter, 2020) in its commitment to being an anti-racist journal. We acknowledge that JPP must do more to increase representation in pediatric psychology research, to support diversity, and to encourage the use of frameworks that explicitly incorporate social context (Matsui et al., 2020). To accomplish this goal, an anti-racist workgroup was formed from members of the JPP editorial team including the Editor, Associate Editors, and Assistant Editors. This editorial reports on the first project of the workgroup—to develop author and reviewer instructions for the reporting of race and ethnicity in papers submitted to JPP. To guide this effort, our workgroup reviewed key editorials, guidelines, and