The "standards for openness hypothesis": Why women find (conflict) avoidance more dissatisfying than men
The "standards for openness hypothesis": Why women find (conflict) avoidance more dissatisfying than men
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0265407511420193
复制
发表时间：
2012-02-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Aldeis, Desiree
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Afifi, Tamara D.;Joseph, Andrea;Aldeis, Desiree
本研究测试了一个新的标准开放性假说，认为回避和不满意之间的关联将是非递归的，开放性和主题回避标准之间的差异应与反刍（特别是女性），这反过来，预测关系的不满。100对约会情侣谈论了一个引发冲突的话题，并在一周后完成了一项跟踪调查。开放性假设的标准在很大程度上适用于女性，但不适用于男性，而且只适用于对伴侣回避的看法。此外，谈话前越不满意的男性和女性，他们在谈话中回避的越多，但男性的回避并不能像女性那样预测谈话后的关系不满意。
This study tests a new standards for openness hypothesis, which argues that the association between avoidance and dissatisfaction will be non-recursive and that the discrepancy between standards for openness and topic avoidance should be associated with rumination (particularly for women), which, in turn, predicts relational dissatisfaction. One hundred dating couples talked about a conflict-inducing topic and completed a follow-up survey one week later. The standards for openness hypothesis largely held true for women, but not men, and only for perceptions of partners' avoidance. In addition, the more dissatisfied men and women were before the conversation, the more they avoided during it, butmen's avoidance did not predict relationship dissatisfaction after the conversation like it did for women.